bump 3.7.7

[jafraustro]

comment two patches

Checklist

• Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

[jafraustro]

@conda-forge-admin , please rerender

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[jafraustro]

Hi @ocefpaf,
The build in #97 failed do to patches: 0003-VC9 and 0004-VC9

I'm not an expert—do you know if these patches are still necessary? Also, is there a reason why libarchive has not been updated? The build in #96 was successful.

[ocefpaf]

I'm not an expert—do you know if these patches are still necessary?

We need to check if they were upstreamed or if they need to be refreshed due to code change.

Also, is there a reason why libarchive has not been updated? The build in #96 was successful.

B/c no one had the time to do the above 😬

[AndresGuzman-Ballen]

Looks like the patches don't apply because the upstream code had made some minor modifications to some header files (like checking whether Windows version is XP or older): https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/pull/2374/files. I don't know what the ramifications are for 0003 patch either (which needs to take into account new updates to CMakeLists.txt: libarchive/libarchive@v3.7.4...v3.7.7#diff-1e7de1ae2d059d21e1dd75d5812d5a34b0222cef273b7c3a2af62eb747f9d20a)

[ocefpaf]

We probably need to refresh those patches then.

[AndresGuzman-Ballen]

@ocefpaf I refreshed them :) jafraustro#1 I created the PR against jafraustro:3_7_7 so we didn't close this PR though

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

• ℹ️ The recipe is not parsable by parser conda-souschef (grayskull). Your recipe may not receive automatic updates and/or may not be compatible with conda-forge's infrastructure. Please check the logs for more information and ensure your recipe can be parsed.

[jafraustro]

Hi, @ocefpaf
can you give a look? please