Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Corrected description of containerd_address from GRPC to ttrpc #850

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

z63d
Copy link
Contributor

@z63d z63d commented Feb 13, 2025

This is probably a mistake.

Mossaka
Mossaka previously approved these changes Feb 14, 2025
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ pub struct InstanceConfig {
bundle: PathBuf,
/// Namespace for containerd
namespace: String,
// /// GRPC address back to main containerd
/// GRPC address back to main containerd
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

technically this should be a ttrpc address

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, I think this is indeed the grpc address. The one that the wasm-oci code uses to talk back with c8d.
IIRC, this is /var/containerd/containerd.sock, while the ttrpc socket is /var/containerd/containerd.sock.ttrpc

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yes you're right! I merged this PR in but we can revert it back

@z63d z63d changed the title fix: Doc comment is overwritten by a comment fix: Corrected description of containerd_address from GRPC to ttrpc Feb 14, 2025
@Mossaka Mossaka merged commit 85b2353 into containerd:main Feb 14, 2025
73 of 74 checks passed
@z63d z63d deleted the fix/doc-comment branch February 14, 2025 00:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants