-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Istio e2e #80
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[WIP] Istio e2e #80
Conversation
@nacx would you have a look at the e2e? Whenever I add the wasmplugin it fails to pull the image that I explicitly loaded a few steps before. |
I'm not sure about the |
Having another thought on this, I think we should not have Istio-specific e2e tests here. Having Istio-specific APIs here like the WASM plugin API just brings complexity and maintenance burden to this project for very little gain. In the end, the objective of this would be to make sure we remain Envoy compatible with whatever Envoy version matrix we agree on, but I think having Isito-specific tests here is out of scope and only brings unnecessary complexity. |
Mixed feelings here. Although that is true we provide a docker image that
fits the wasm plugin spec from istio and that artifact is not tested
(although we do our best effort with istio tests).
…On Tue, 15 Nov 2022, 11:13 Ignasi Barrera, ***@***.***> wrote:
Having another thought on this, I think we should not have Istio-specific
e2e tests here.
Having Istio-specific APIs here like the WASM plugin API just brings
complexity and maintenance burden to this project for very little gain. In
the end, the objective of this would be to make sure we remain Envoy
compatible with whatever Envoy version matrix we agree on, but I think
having Isito-specific tests here is out of scope and only brings
unnecessary complexity.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#80 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXOYATCFZ5OPAGWVIDXY6DWINO2ZANCNFSM6AAAAAASAHLFPA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
If you really want to test that, the way to test it not by requiring Istio and an entire k8s setup. We should just test that the image meets the spec (not that it works with Istio). |
Related corazawaf/coraza#594 |
No description provided.