Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ES-1738: update codeowners file so team leads must review toml changes #1409

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2023

Conversation

ronanbrowne
Copy link
Contributor

With the introduction of dependabot updates via a version catalogue (toml file), we should have team leads review any changes to this file as this impacts dependencies, this is in one with the previous gradle.properties workflows

@ronanbrowne ronanbrowne requested review from a team as code owners December 14, 2023 09:13
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link
Collaborator

@wzur-r3 wzur-r3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@corda-jenkins-ci02
Copy link
Contributor

Scanning for breaking API changes introduced by this PR

Scan Succeeded

Copy link
Contributor

@driessamyn driessamyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@corda-jenkins-ci02
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins build for PR 1409 build 1

Build Successful:
Jar artifact version produced by this PR: 5.2.0.12-alpha-1702545239965

@ronanbrowne ronanbrowne merged commit 13d9bbe into release/os/5.2 Dec 14, 2023
7 checks passed
@ronanbrowne ronanbrowne deleted the ronanb/update-code-owners branch December 14, 2023 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants