-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add eckey_t #93
Open
gocarlos
wants to merge
12
commits into
cose-wg:master
Choose a base branch
from
gocarlos:feat--add-eckey_t
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
95be68c
feat: add eckey_t
gocarlos ed2be92
chore: create configure.h at configuration time
gocarlos 1eab41d
fix: typos
gocarlos 893d9cf
fix: typos
gocarlos abeff7a
fix: pragma message
gocarlos e0d24e9
build: fix install fuer config header
gocarlos 3b579de
style: add new line
gocarlos 48f04db
refactor: rename functions from sign0 to sign1
gocarlos f412dad
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into feat--add-eckey_t
gocarlos afb973c
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into feat--add-eckey_t
gocarlos a590f55
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into feat--add-eckey_t
gocarlos daba796
Merge branch 'master' into feat--add-eckey_t
gocarlos File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As noted in the other pull request, this is not the way that I think this should go in the end. It would be better to declare a COSE_Key structure and have a method to build that. This can this be changed internal to the library without issues as well as adding some other types of keys. If you are doing this, please just make this specific to MBEDTLS as passing in the structure is not how one would do this for OpenSSL, instead you would pass in an EVP_KEY *.
I don't know what the current support is in MBEDTLS for TEMs at the moment. I would expect that at some point in the future this is going to be added if not currently present and that would require yet a different possible internal change for that support.