feat: update cow-sdk to 4.1.0

[alfetopito]

Summary

Fixing issue reported internally here

Essentially, this order displays 0 fee although the value is filled.

It was fixed in cowprotocol/cow-sdk#197

This change simply uses cow-sdk version released with that fix.

To Test

1. Open the order 0xdedb65b51a6f81493f8e6e1d811b56a57297dbb6fb11716d85e646a66a5d041f85cc3c8da85612013acabe9b5d954d578860b3c165a22c43 in the explorer

• Fee should not be 0

2. Play around with different orders

• Fee should be displayed as usual

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
cosmos	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Jan 16, 2024 4:46pm
explorer-dev	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Jan 16, 2024 4:46pm
swap-dev	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Jan 16, 2024 4:46pm
widget-configurator	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Jan 16, 2024 4:46pm

[socket-security]

Updated dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Packages	Version	New capabilities	Transitives	Size	Publisher
@cowprotocol/cow-sdk	4.0.7...4.1.0	None	+0/-0	1.1 MB

[elena-zh]

Hey @alfetopito , frankly, I don't remember whether it was possible to show fees for a partially filled order with several fills?

[alfetopito]

Hey @alfetopito , frankly, I don't remember whether it was possible to show fees for a partially filled order with several fills?

Good question!

We should show a fee, for sure.

Right now we don't show any on prod either (although there I see a 0 instead).

Checked the data and there's nothing returned by the backend.
Will check with them.

Still, this is a new issue.

[elena-zh]

Created a separate issue for an order with several fils #3666