Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove executed_solver_fee #2178
Remove executed_solver_fee #2178
Changes from 5 commits
19f5bdf
02d24e2
2cb4e89
0cb891e
68520cb
5ec89e9
8743f40
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit:
buy_token
andbuy_token_index
are only needed in theExecutedFee::Surplus
case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Together with the comment 👇 , I tried to find more readable code but failed. Note that most of the orders will go through the
ExecutedFee::Surplus
code path once swap with zero fees feature is enabled. Feel free to reorganize the code in another way in a separate PR, since I failed to make any improvements (or even in this one).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found it pretty confusing that
(sell|buy)_index
was used once to refer to the adjusted price and once for the UCP.It would help to either prefix them maybe
ucp_sell_index
or limit the scope where you change the meaning like: