feat(realtime-api): feat: add getRtcEngine method to expose RTC engine #83
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new method Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant RealtimeClient
participant EngineClient
participant RTCEngine
User->>RealtimeClient: getRtcEngine()
RealtimeClient->>EngineClient: getRtcEngine()
EngineClient-->>RealtimeClient: Return RTCEngine instance
RealtimeClient-->>User: Return RTCEngine or undefined
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/realtime-api/src/client.ts (1)
425-427: Add documentation and consider access modifier.While the implementation is correct, consider:
- Adding JSDoc documentation to match the style in index.ts
- Using the
protectedmodifier since this method is primarily for internal use by RealtimeClient+ /** + * Returns the RTC engine instance. + * @internal + */ - getRtcEngine() { + protected getRtcEngine() { return this.engine; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
common/changes/@coze/realtime-api/feat-realtime-api_2025-01-20-11-15.json(1 hunks)packages/realtime-api/README.md(1 hunks)packages/realtime-api/README.zh-CN.md(1 hunks)packages/realtime-api/src/client.ts(1 hunks)packages/realtime-api/src/index.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/realtime-api/src/index.ts (1)
317-324: LGTM! Consider documenting potential security implications.The implementation is clean and well-documented. However, since this method exposes the internal RTC engine instance, it would be beneficial to document any security considerations or best practices for using the exposed engine.
Let's verify if the documentation adequately covers the security aspects:
common/changes/@coze/realtime-api/feat-realtime-api_2025-01-20-11-15.json (1)
1-11: LGTM! Change log entry is accurate.The change is correctly categorized as a minor version bump and includes a clear description.
packages/realtime-api/README.zh-CN.md (1)
82-84: LGTM! Verify English README consistency.The Chinese documentation is well-structured and consistent with the implementation.
Let's verify if the English README has matching changes:
✅ Verification successful
English README is consistent ✓
The English README has matching changes with proper documentation and formatting.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if English README has matching changes # Compare the relevant sections of both README files rg -A 2 "getRtcEngine" "packages/realtime-api/README.md"Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get more context around getRtcEngine in English README rg -B 2 -A 2 "getRtcEngine" "packages/realtime-api/README.md"Length of output: 254
packages/realtime-api/README.md (2)
86-86: LGTM!The comma addition is correct and maintains proper object literal syntax.
87-88: Consider security implications and improve documentation.While exposing the RTC engine instance provides flexibility, please consider:
- Document potential security implications of exposing the internal engine instance
- Add return type information in the example
- Specify compatible RTC engine versions
- Consider hosting critical documentation internally instead of relying on external links
Let's check if there are any existing security guidelines or documentation standards:
✅ Verification successful
Add usage guidelines to the documentation
The implementation is type-safe and follows the codebase patterns, but the documentation could be enhanced:
- Add a note about proper usage scenarios and best practices
- Consider documenting version compatibility with
@volcengine/rtc- Include a brief example demonstrating a common use case
The security concern is mitigated by TypeScript's type safety through the
IRTCEngineinterface.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for security guidelines and documentation patterns rg -i "security|documentation" README.md fd -e md -x rg -l "engine|rtc" {}Length of output: 261
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for RTC engine related types and interfaces ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_RtcEngine {$$$}' ast-grep --pattern 'type $_RtcEngine = $$$' # Search for RTC engine usage patterns and security measures rg -i "rtcengine" -A 3 -B 3 rg -i "security|secure" packages/realtime-api/ # Check both README files for engine-related documentation cat packages/realtime-api/README.md packages/realtime-api/README.zh-CN.md | rg -i "rtc.*engine|engine.*rtc" -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 4840
…e instance
Summary by CodeRabbit
getRtcEngine()method to the Realtime API package