Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): downgrade node-fetch from ^3.3.2 to ^2.x #89

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

jackshen310
Copy link
Collaborator

@jackshen310 jackshen310 commented Feb 6, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced network communication reliability to ensure a smoother and more consistent user experience.
    • Downgraded node-fetch dependency to improve compatibility and stability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the @coze/api package by downgrading the node-fetch dependency from version ^3.3.2 to ^2.x. This change is reflected in both the metadata JSON file and the package's package.json. The modifications are categorized as patch changes, focusing solely on the dependency version without altering the core control flow or functionality of the application.

Changes

File(s) Modified Change Summary
common/changes/.../fix-bug_2025-02-06-12-48.json, common/changes/.../fix-bug_2025-02-06-12-56.json, common/changes/.../fix-bug_2025-02-06-13-14.json, packages/coze-js/package.json Downgraded node-fetch from ^3.3.2 to ^2.x in the @coze/api package; added @types/node-fetch with version ^2.x in devDependencies.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jsongo

Poem

Oh, I'm a bunny with a hop so neat,
Changing versions with a gentle beat,
From modern to classic, a simple flip,
I nibble updates in one swift skip!
Happy code carrots on this fine day 🥕🐇!

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9a588f and 1c00c01.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • common/config/subspaces/default/pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • common/changes/@coze/api/fix-bug_2025-02-06-12-48.json (1 hunks)
  • common/changes/@coze/api/fix-bug_2025-02-06-12-56.json (1 hunks)
  • common/changes/@coze/api/fix-bug_2025-02-06-13-14.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/coze-js/package.json (3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • common/changes/@coze/api/fix-bug_2025-02-06-12-56.json
  • common/changes/@coze/api/fix-bug_2025-02-06-13-14.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • common/changes/@coze/api/fix-bug_2025-02-06-12-48.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js v20 (ubuntu-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/coze-js/package.json (2)

53-53: Node-Fetch Dependency Downgrade to v2
The dependency "node-fetch": "^2.x" has been downgraded from version ^3.3.2 in accordance with the PR objective. Please verify that all usages of node-fetch in your codebase are compatible with v2, especially regarding any differences in module formats (CommonJS vs. ESM) between v2 and v3.


63-63: Addition of Type Definitions for Node-Fetch v2
The new entry for "@types/node-fetch": "^2.x" in the devDependencies is a good enhancement to ensure proper TypeScript type checking for the downgraded node-fetch library. Confirm that these type definitions correctly reflect the API used in the project.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jackshen310 jackshen310 changed the title chore(deps): downgrade node-fetch from ^3.3.2 to ^2.7.0 chore(deps): downgrade node-fetch from ^3.3.2 to ^2.x Feb 6, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #89      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.82%   90.65%   -1.18%     
==========================================
  Files         117       66      -51     
  Lines        5469     3049    -2420     
  Branches     1106      559     -547     
==========================================
- Hits         5022     2764    -2258     
+ Misses        447      283     -164     
- Partials        0        2       +2     
Components Coverage Δ
coze-js 92.95% <ø> (ø)
realtime-api 91.86% <ø> (ø)

see 53 files with indirect coverage changes

@Tecvan-fe Tecvan-fe enabled auto-merge February 7, 2025 03:01
@Tecvan-fe Tecvan-fe self-requested a review February 7, 2025 03:02
@Tecvan-fe Tecvan-fe added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into coze-dev:main with commit a488689 Feb 7, 2025
8 checks passed
@Tecvan-fe Tecvan-fe deleted the fix/bug branch February 7, 2025 03:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants