Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tests to validate generated XML against XSDs #1463

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

JPercival
Copy link
Contributor

  • Ensure serialized XML passes XSD validation for ELM
  • Add some round-trips tests to ensure serialized/deserialized ELM is indentical

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Formatting check succeeded!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.44%. Comparing base (6a07897) to head (7ced18c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1463      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     64.36%   64.44%   +0.07%     
- Complexity     1928     1937       +9     
============================================
  Files           494      494              
  Lines         28139    28139              
  Branches       5587     5587              
============================================
+ Hits          18111    18133      +22     
+ Misses         7774     7753      -21     
+ Partials       2254     2253       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Dec 5, 2024

@JPercival JPercival merged commit b4b0701 into master Dec 11, 2024
7 checks passed
@JPercival JPercival deleted the feature-xml-serialization-tests branch December 11, 2024 16:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants