-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve CTI Taxonomy documentation #685
Conversation
This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more). |
@@ -22,11 +22,21 @@ export const columns = [ | |||
|
|||
<GithubIconRender url={fpURL}></GithubIconRender> | |||
|
|||
IPs in this category are considered completely safe and trusted. Alerts triggered by these IPs are likely due to misconfiguration or overly sensitive alerting rules. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we tell a bit more about our process of qualifying an IP as SAFE ?
Say that we have a list of genuine know crawlers exposing their IPs and ranges and that we take those in account to qualify an IP as SAFE.
Safe also means that it has no malicious intent, not that it isn't triggering certain scenarios, mainly crawling scenarios
|
||
:::warning | ||
|
||
You might want to investigate any alerts associated with these IPs to ensure your configuration is correct. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have doubts about FP ?
Ideally we should NOt have doubt if we qualify them as FP with a strict list of genuine crawlers and safe bots
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, But I made 2 comments on things we could precise for the user understanding
No description provided.