-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DAOS-15596: Update to argobots 1.2 #26
Conversation
Update packaging. Cease building on CentOS 7. Test with 'pr' tests. Skip-PR-comments: true Skip-list: test_daos_single_rdg_tx:DAOS-14982 Required-githooks: true Signed-off-by: Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]>
Skip-PR-comments: true Skip-list: test_daos_single_rdg_tx:DAOS-14982 Required-githooks: true Signed-off-by: Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]>
Update packaging/ Add patch 411e5b3 remove deprecated patch 7fd1987 Signed-off-by: Cedric Koch-Hofer <[email protected]>
Fix source patching Signed-off-by: Cedric Koch-Hofer <[email protected]>
The test failure with master is a known issue:
Issue of the release 2.6 are also related to the same tickets: timeout not respected for an not yet defined reason. |
Integrate reviewers comments. Signed-off-by: Cedric Koch-Hofer <[email protected]>
Remove useless local patch Signed-off-by: Cedric Koch-Hofer <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one small change to revert the Makefile
changes I think.
Remove useless local patch management. Signed-off-by: Cedric Koch-Hofer <[email protected]>
Fix invalid patch path. Signed-off-by: Cedric Koch-Hofer <[email protected]>
@knard-intel Please add @daos-stack/release-engineering as reviewer when you are ready for this to land. |
@brianjmurrell , just discovered this morning a potential regression of the configuration option with argobots v1.2.
I am able to reproduce it locally. |
Sounds good. If there is a regression, it would be prudent for us to understand how it was not found in testing and rectify that. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
-1 pending @knard-intel's investigation of a potential regression.
This PR is blocked until the PR pmodels/argobots#401 has been landed. |
Add configure option to enable check of configure step Signed-off-by: Cedric Koch-Hofer <[email protected]>
|
It works!
Great job @knard-intel. |
OK, so lets try it without the faulty commit. |
cddd5b2
to
dbcdfee
Compare
I am not able to investigate why the CI is failing. |
I am able again to access the CI. |
The only failure is a known issue with argobots stack overflow and UCX:
|
Please @daos-stack/release-engineering could you lend this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this PR fixes more than one ticket, please also add Fixes: DAOS-14248
to your commit message so that the commit message makes it clear which additional issues are being fixed (i.e. in addition to the one mentioned in the commit subject).
argobots.spec
Outdated
* Wed Sep 04 2024 Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]> - 1.2-1 | ||
- Update to 1.2 | ||
- Add patch 411e5b3 fixing DAOS-14248 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please update the datestamp here and add a comment about the 2nd patch that has been added and it's ticket number.
Please also feel free to change the author here to yourself since you did the most significant amount of work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Add reference to the new patch bb0c908 fixing configuration issue
- Update author and timestamp
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Integrate reviewers comments: - Add reference to the new patch bb0c908 fixing configuration issue - Update author and timestamp Signed-off-by: Cedric Koch-Hofer <[email protected]>
I have restarted the stage which was failing on getting access to external resources.
Please @daos-stack/release-engineering could you please land this PR and its associated DAOS one daos-stack/daos#15181 |
Integrate reviewers comments: - Harmonize documentation Signed-off-by: Cedric Koch-Hofer <[email protected]>
Please @daos-stack/release-engineering could you please land this PR and its associated DAOS one daos-stack/daos#15181 |
All tests are passing of the latest build https://build.hpdd.intel.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/daos-stack%2Fargobots/detail/PR-26/14/pipeline/463 are passing. I have successfully restarted the failing test https://build.hpdd.intel.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/daos-stack%2Fdaos/detail/ci-daos-stack-argobots-PR-26-release-2.6/4/pipeline and it is passing with the build https://build.hpdd.intel.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/daos-stack%2Fdaos/detail/ci-daos-stack-argobots-PR-26-release-2.6/6/pipeline/ |
I will go ahead and do that. In the future, you can signal you are ready for landing by simply adding @daos-stack/release-engineering as a reviewer, similar to how you add @daos-stack/daos-gatekeeper to daos requests.
I cannot land that one. You will need to request @daos-stack/daos-gatekeeper for that one. But I have also requested changes on that one so it will need another push before it's ready. |
Description