Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix input table jpy restriction #5260
Fix input table jpy restriction #5260
Changes from 5 commits
0f386a9
e44039f
d9db20b
cb2792d
6e9e9e3
0a1cc20
42765af
302321f
b143ab7
672a2ed
319a68d
47e866c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Presumably, this is slower than the existing behavior. The only place I can imagine where that might matter is something like a
PartitionedTable.transform
with a Python function. Does the Java constituentTable
get wrapped automatically as a PythonTable
wrapper, and if so , is it slow enough to matter?@jmao-denver you might need to test this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, they are not. When requested (e.g. via. constituent_tables()), the constituent tables are explicitly wrapped in Table, not through this auto wrapping facility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think that addresses my concern. I am talking about when you pass a Python function (adapted to Java) to
transform
.deephaven.table.PartitionedTable.transform
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some quick/minimal testing, ~2 - 4 % slower, the more constituent tables, the slower, which is kinda expected (more wrapping):
Before:
After: