-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
performance plot #35
performance plot #35
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's good, let's continue working on it!
- make plotly plot instead - I'm not sure if using ipywidgets will be the best solution in this case, as plotly has some built-in support for dropdowns, see original issue description
- change the input format to a tuple of (err_low, value, err_high) instead of list of all values - someone else will take care of computing this efficiently on the dataset scale
- make it look somewhat like that, with colors as arguments with reasonable defaults; loss is log scale
4536eb1
to
5e0352b
Compare
I have changed the plotting by using Plotly, the only thing I'm not sure about is this coloring thing @jettjaniak
|
Two things to follow up on:
|
Yeah I just thought that we already have data as in logprobs, so the loss calculated is already in log
|
Yeah, I think you're right. Jett, thoughts? You mentioned wanting a log
scale in an earlier comment, were you just referring to charting logprob?
…On Mon, Feb 19, 2024, 6:01 PM Siwei Li ***@***.***> wrote:
Yeah I just thought that we already have data as in logprobs, so the loss
calculated is already in log
1. I think we want the loss (y axis) to be log scale.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#35 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC5BY5AC5BBIH5EEQNXG4TYUP7WVAVCNFSM6AAAAABDJMJ7RCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJTGM3DSNZSG4>
.
You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
just had a meeting with Sil, a few small bits to address and we can merge |
Todos:
|
No description provided.