-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
APPEALS-63207 Add a Task Action to move appeals from one attorney to another for decision drafting #23591
Open
kristeja
wants to merge
9
commits into
feature/APPEALS-60032
Choose a base branch
from
krishna/APPEALS-63207
base: feature/APPEALS-60032
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+12
−1
Open
APPEALS-63207 Add a Task Action to move appeals from one attorney to another for decision drafting #23591
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ecd9ab4
APPEALS-63207 Add new task action and wrap under feature flag
kristeja dcd666d
APPEALS-63207 update seed to test the atty to atty workflow
kristeja 7af9352
APPEALS-63207 revert seed data to previous state
kristeja da93d6c
APPEALS-63207 address PR comments
kristeja cf3c52f
APPEALS-63207 fixed task actions issue and updated condition and wrap…
kristeja b090082
APPEALS-63207 refactored code
kristeja 252625f
Merge branch 'feature/APPEALS-60032' into krishna/APPEALS-63207
kristeja 70d23c5
APPEALS-63207 refactor available actions method
kristeja cb50fc9
APPEALS-63207 revert task action repository file changes
kristeja File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ def available_actions(current_user, role) | |
Constants.TASK_ACTIONS.SUBMIT_OMO_REQUEST_FOR_REVIEW.to_h, | ||
Constants.TASK_ACTIONS.ADD_ADMIN_ACTION.to_h] | ||
|
||
if SpecialCaseMovementTeam.singleton.user_has_access?(current_user) && | ||
legacy_atty_to_atty_special_case_movement(current_user) | ||
actions << Constants.TASK_ACTIONS.ASSIGN_TO_ATTORNEY.to_h | ||
end | ||
|
||
actions | ||
end | ||
|
||
|
@@ -23,4 +28,9 @@ def timeline_title | |
def label | ||
COPY::ATTORNEY_TASK_LABEL | ||
end | ||
|
||
def legacy_atty_to_atty_special_case_movement(user) | ||
FeatureToggle.enabled?(:legacy_case_movement_atty_to_atty_for_decisiondraft, user: user) && | ||
appeal.tasks.open.where(type: AttorneyLegacyTask.name) && appeal.is_a?(LegacyAppeal) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There won't be an |
||
end | ||
end |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that we should use
.can_act_on_behalf_of_judges?
from the User model here instead ofuser_has_access?
. They are functionally similar, butcan_act_on_behalf_of_judges?
is a more semantic/clear way of writing it to explain why the user has access to that action.