Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency eslint-config-xo-typescript to v7 #219

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 1, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint-config-xo-typescript 1.0.1 -> 7.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

xojs/eslint-config-xo-typescript (eslint-config-xo-typescript)

v7.0.0

Compare Source

v6.0.0

Compare Source

New rules
Breaking
Improvements

v5.0.0

Compare Source

v4.0.0

Compare Source

  • Disable default-case rule to avoid conflict with stricter @typescript-eslint/switch-exhaustiveness-check rule (#​85) 8cb7722

v3.0.0

Compare Source

v2.1.1

Compare Source

v2.1.0

Compare Source

v2.0.0

Compare Source

Breaking
New rules
Improvements
  • @typescript-eslint/switch-exhaustiveness-check: Make it stricter df07e88

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-config-xo-typescript-7.x branch 5 times, most recently from f6fa27c to 7db2563 Compare January 2, 2025 00:04
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-config-xo-typescript-7.x branch from 7db2563 to b26e123 Compare January 2, 2025 04:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants