Fix explicit assignment slice group parsing #65
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
According to the spec, the two values pic_size_in_map_units_minus1 and num_slice_groups_minus1 should be used the other way around. Fixes #57
dholroyd
force-pushed
the
explicit-assignment-slice-group-parsing
branch
from
628f07d to
fc9c767
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix variable-name confusion error.
According to the spec, the two values
pic_size_in_map_units_minus1andnum_slice_groups_minus1should be used the other way around. As pointed out by @wrv.Fixes #57
Also, fix a nearby calculation which lacked
ceil(). The spec asks forCeil( Log2( num_slice_groups_minus1 + 1 ) )