Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[OPTIONAL] Add a note about OSX locales and pipenv #7

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tinvaan
Copy link
Contributor

@tinvaan tinvaan commented Aug 17, 2021

Just a small note for first time users to follow along.

@bendialpad
Copy link

I'm not sure if we should be adding external library-specific notes here since there's most likely a long list of gotchas with those libraries that can be found on their respective repos. @jakedialpad any thoughts?

@tinvaan
Copy link
Contributor Author

tinvaan commented Feb 16, 2022

I'm not sure if we should be adding external library-specific notes here since there's most likely a long list of gotchas with those libraries that can be found on their respective repos. @jakedialpad any thoughts?

Agree. However, this particular issue seemed more platform specific than library specific. Either way, it's not a make or break change. Fine by me either way.

@tinvaan tinvaan changed the title Add a note about OSX locales and pipenv [OPTIONAL] Add a note about OSX locales and pipenv Feb 16, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@jakedialpad jakedialpad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, FWIW I'm all for highlighting common gotchas 👍

If it's a super rare issue then we might just be adding extra noise, but this seems like a good one to me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@@ -87,6 +87,13 @@ pipenv install --dev

That was easy :)

<b>NOTE</b>: If you're on OSX, you may need to set the LOCALE's explcitly before running the `pipenv install` command.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just noticed a little typo: explcitly -> explicitly
:p

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants