Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Schema changes for application-level aggregation metrics. #3315

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

branlwyd
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@branlwyd branlwyd requested a review from a team as a code owner July 22, 2024 16:32
aggregator_core/src/datastore.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
task_id BIGINT NOT NULL, -- task ID the counter is associated with
ord BIGINT NOT NULL, -- the ordinal index of the task aggregation counter

success BIGINT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0, -- reports successfully aggregated
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we not want to track preparation failures by reason the way we do upload failures? If nothing else, keeping track of either total failures or total prep attempts would let us compute success rate.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See response to inahga's comment:

I'm implementing the least amount of functionality that gives us what we need; I'm OK leaning on operational metrics (e.g. prometheus/grafana) & logging for other issues, at least until we have a justification for splitting them out. (And yeah, I think it would be easy to add more to this later.)

Success rate, specifically, can be tracked via the operational metrics.


CONSTRAINT task_aggregation_counters_unique_id UNIQUE(task_id, ord),
CONSTRAINT fk_task_id FOREIGN KEY(task_id) REFERENCES tasks(id) ON DELETE CASCADE
) WITH (fillfactor = 50);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that uploading these counter tables can be performance sensitive, I'm surprised we don't create an index on task ID. Maybe it's irrelevant because this table will be smallish anyway?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CONSTRAINT task_aggregation_counters_unique_id UNIQUE(task_id, ord) implicitly creates an index on (task_id, ord). We only ever INSERT on (task_id, ord) or SELECT task_id and aggregate over ord.

I have some query plans from task upload counters #2508 (comment).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

UNIQUE constraints generate a (unique) index on the relevant fields, so we have an index on (task_id, ord).

See https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-constraints.html#DDL-CONSTRAINTS-UNIQUE-CONSTRAINTS:

Adding a unique constraint will automatically create a unique B-tree index on the column or group of columns listed in the constraint.

task_id BIGINT NOT NULL, -- task ID the counter is associated with
ord BIGINT NOT NULL, -- the ordinal index of the task aggregation counter

success BIGINT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0, -- reports successfully aggregated
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see we're not going to track the other failures that could come up, like task upload counters do. Rationale? I'm nominally OK with this, since if we want this functionality it should be fairly trivial to bolt it on later.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@branlwyd branlwyd Jul 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm implementing the least amount of functionality that gives us what we need; I'm OK leaning on operational metrics (e.g. prometheus/grafana) & logging for other issues, at least until we have a justification for splitting them out. (And yeah, I think it would be easy to add more to this later.)

 * Remove support for SQL schema version 5.
 * Spacing on new table definition.
@branlwyd branlwyd enabled auto-merge (squash) July 22, 2024 17:06
@branlwyd branlwyd merged commit 3119f07 into main Jul 22, 2024
8 checks passed
@branlwyd branlwyd deleted the bran/helper-metrics-schema branch July 22, 2024 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants