-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated outdated deployment steps #3266
Open
krissetto
wants to merge
1
commit into
docker:main
Choose a base branch
from
krissetto:add-deployment-instructions
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure we need to document the
dry-run
option, or ossify it as part of the actual release process, as it's just a debugging/testing tool. At most, I'd explain what it does i.e. "Ifdry-run
is checked, then the package is build but a release is not created/uploaded to pypi"There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my logic here was "better safe than sorry" (considering past events), but i'm ok with changing this :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It removes "if-branching" from the steps and can be followed as-is in a sense
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
to clarify my point, I just mean that running a dry-run first is not a necessary step of the release process, so I don't think we should document it as such, since it might introduce confusion "do I have to do a dry run before releasing?". Instead we could just explain what it does (and if we want, mention something like "it's advisable to test the release pipeline before release by checking the "dry-run" option).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I get your point. I agree that technically speaking a dry run is not necessary, but I'd argue it should be part of the "release process" so that people double check the version number, and only those in-the-know (or confident enough) should skip it at their discretion.
I'm saying this mostly because the result of the pipeline is yes a "draft release" on github, but at that point of the process the package has already been published to pypi and users might be downloading it before we realize and correct any potential issue.
No super hard feelings here, lets see if others have also differing opinions on this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't disagree, I just think that including "dry-run" in that section removes clarity about what it actually does. The same can be achieved by separately explaining what "dry-run" does, and strongly advising it's use.
@thaJeztah ?