UnmanagedFunctionPointer doesn't require field names to be functional#10724

Merged

gewarren merged 1 commit intodotnet:mainfrom vitek-karas:UnmanagedFunctionPointerFieldName

Dec 5, 2024

+1-1

Commits on Dec 5, 2024

UnmanagedFunctionPointer doesn't require field names to be functional. Fixing the doc to just state that the fields are optional.
vitek-karas
committed