You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have recently had a hard time trying to understand the function of the parameters reference_frame and base_frame of the class DQ_Kinematics. I am not sure if the problem is the current state of the documentation, the name of those parameters, or if I unnecessarily complicated things by looking at the code and thinking about how I would have done things instead of following the implementation (or even more likely, a combination of all above). Regardless, the impression I had is that "reference_frame" would set the frame of reference used by methods such as fkm, whereas base_frame would inform those methods of the current pose of the robot base.
Considering that, I was expecting the following results from the code:
After setting the robot's reference_frame to coincide with the pose of its end-effector, I expected a subsequent call of the method fkm to return DQ(1) since the transformation from the new reference frame to the end-effector is the identity;
After changing the base_frame, I expected to have a new end-effector pose returned by fkm since now the robot moved, and the reference frame remained unchanged.
I have spoken with @bvadorno, and he clarified things for me. Nonetheless, he asked me to open a request for documentation improvement. Unfortunately, as I am not sure of what exactly caused my confusion, I cannot recommend a specific solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks a lot for your comment. I assigned the issue to my self. I also changed the label to enhancement and question as the issue you mentioned is likely a documentation improvement instead of a bug.
I have recently had a hard time trying to understand the function of the parameters reference_frame and base_frame of the class DQ_Kinematics. I am not sure if the problem is the current state of the documentation, the name of those parameters, or if I unnecessarily complicated things by looking at the code and thinking about how I would have done things instead of following the implementation (or even more likely, a combination of all above). Regardless, the impression I had is that "reference_frame" would set the frame of reference used by methods such as fkm, whereas base_frame would inform those methods of the current pose of the robot base.
Considering that, I was expecting the following results from the code:
After setting the robot's reference_frame to coincide with the pose of its end-effector, I expected a subsequent call of the method fkm to return DQ(1) since the transformation from the new reference frame to the end-effector is the identity;
After changing the base_frame, I expected to have a new end-effector pose returned by fkm since now the robot moved, and the reference frame remained unchanged.
I have spoken with @bvadorno, and he clarified things for me. Nonetheless, he asked me to open a request for documentation improvement. Unfortunately, as I am not sure of what exactly caused my confusion, I cannot recommend a specific solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: