Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pyproject.toml: Update version for pyshacl #320

Conversation

s-heppner
Copy link
Contributor

@s-heppner s-heppner commented Nov 6, 2024

Previously, we used version 0.26.0 of pyshacl. This version however had a problem with typing, namely the py.typed file was in the wrong location (see pyshacl#267).

This has been fixed in this new release, therefore we bump the version number in our dependency declaration.

This also should fix our CI Pipeline in the RDF branch, as we both fix the mypy issues, as well as some pycodestyle ones.

@s-heppner s-heppner force-pushed the RDF/Fix/pySHACL_version branch from 99494f5 to e53b8a5 Compare November 6, 2024 08:13
Previously, we used version 0.26.0 of pyshacl.
This version however had a problem with typing,
namely the `py.typed` file was in the wrong
location (see [pyshacl#267]).

This has been fixed in this new release, therefore
we bump the version number in our dependency
declaration.

This also should fix our CI Pipeline, as we both
fix the mypy issues, as well as some pycodestyle
ones.

[pyshacl#267]: RDFLib/pySHACL#267
@s-heppner s-heppner force-pushed the RDF/Fix/pySHACL_version branch from e53b8a5 to 377cc03 Compare November 6, 2024 08:23
@s-heppner s-heppner mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@zrgt zrgt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@s-heppner s-heppner merged commit f2da76b into eclipse-basyx:Experimental/Adapter/RDF Nov 12, 2024
8 checks passed
@s-heppner s-heppner deleted the RDF/Fix/pySHACL_version branch November 12, 2024 09:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants