iox-#2301 Mixed mode 32 and 64 bit

[elBoberido]

Notes for Reviewer

This PR enables to connect 32 and 64 bit applications to have zero-copy communication. It is currently a technology preview based on spin locks and spin semaphores as replacement for their POSIX counterpart. For production, these contructs need to be based on futex on Linux and WaitOnAddress on Windows. For other OSes, solutions need to be found as well.

Pre-Review Checklist for the PR Author

1. Code follows the coding style of CONTRIBUTING.md
2. Tests follow the best practice for testing
3. Changelog updated in the unreleased section including API breaking changes
4. Branch follows the naming format (iox-123-this-is-a-branch)
5. Commits messages are according to this guideline
   • Commit messages have the issue ID (iox-#123 commit text)
   • Commit author matches Eclipse Contributor Agreement (and ECA is signed)
6. Update the PR title
   • Follow the same conventions as for commit messages
   • Link to the relevant issue
7. Relevant issues are linked
8. Add sensible notes for the reviewer
9. All checks have passed (except task-list-completed)
10. Assign PR to reviewer

Checklist for the PR Reviewer

• Consider a second reviewer for complex new features or larger refactorings
• Commits are properly organized and messages are according to the guideline
• Code according to our coding style and naming conventions
• Unit tests have been written for new behavior
• Public API changes are documented via doxygen
• Copyright owner are updated in the changed files
• All touched (C/C++) source code files from iceoryx_hoofs have been added to ./clang-tidy-diff-scans.txt
• PR title describes the changes

Post-review Checklist for the PR Author

1. All open points are addressed and tracked via issues

References

• Relates to 32-Bit Support #2301

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 77.40385% with 47 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 78.33%. Comparing base (5ea8482) to head (8f8bf24).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
iceoryx_hoofs/posix/sync/source/mutex.cpp	39.58%	28 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
iceoryx_hoofs/concurrent/sync/source/spin_lock.cpp	81.63%	5 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...yx_hoofs/concurrent/sync/source/spin_semaphore.cpp	91.66%	1 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...eoryx_hoofs/posix/sync/source/semaphore_helper.cpp	76.92%	3 Missing ⚠️
...osh/source/popo/building_blocks/locking_policy.cpp	75.00%	0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2348      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.61%   78.33%   -5.29%     
==========================================
  Files         433      439       +6     
  Lines       16033    16162     +129     
  Branches     2299     2314      +15     
==========================================
- Hits        13406    12660     -746     
- Misses       2627     2652      +25     
- Partials        0      850     +850     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	78.15% <77.40%> (-5.27%)	⬇️
unittests_timing	15.07% <25.48%> (-1.98%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...yx_hoofs/concurrent/sync/include/iox/spin_lock.hpp	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ofs/concurrent/sync/include/iox/spin_semaphore.hpp	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ceoryx_hoofs/design/include/iox/lock_interface.hpp	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...x_hoofs/design/include/iox/semaphore_interface.hpp	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
iceoryx_hoofs/posix/sync/include/iox/mutex.hpp	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...x_hoofs/posix/sync/include/iox/named_semaphore.hpp	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...hoofs/posix/sync/include/iox/unnamed_semaphore.hpp	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ceoryx_hoofs/posix/sync/source/named_semaphore.cpp	58.47% <100.00%> (-4.03%)	⬇️
...oryx_hoofs/posix/sync/source/unnamed_semaphore.cpp	48.83% <100.00%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
...l/popo/building_blocks/condition_variable_data.hpp	100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 6 more

... and 172 files with indirect coverage changes

[elfenpiff]

Besides of some minor spelling mistakes and a code question everything looks fine.