Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow issues and discussions on eclipse-jdt-core-incubator #2

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

fbricon
Copy link
Contributor

@fbricon fbricon commented Feb 7, 2024

No description provided.

@fbricon fbricon requested review from a team as code owners February 7, 2024 14:31
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Diff for 57d7811:
Printing local diff:

Actions are indicated with the following symbols:
+   create
!   modify
!   forced update
-   delete

Organization eclipse.jdt.ls[id=eclipse-jdtls]
  there have been 3 validation infos, enable verbose output with '-v' to to display them.

  
!   repository[name="eclipse-jdt-core-incubator"] {
!     has_discussions                   = false -> true
!     has_issues                        = false -> true
!   }
  
  Plan: 0 to add, 2 to change, 0 to delete.
Canonical Diff for 57d7811:
Showing canonical diff:

Organization eclipse.jdt.ls[id=eclipse-jdtls]

--- canonical
+++ original
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
       secret_scanning_push_protection: "disabled"
       web_commit_signoff_required: false
       workflows+: {
-        actions_can_approve_pull_request_reviews: false
         default_workflow_permissions: "write"
       }
     }
@@ -85,9 +84,6 @@
           secret: "********"
         }
       ]
-      workflows+: {
-        actions_can_approve_pull_request_reviews: false
-      }
     }
   ]
   secrets+: [

@netomi netomi merged commit 426af2f into eclipse-jdtls:main Feb 7, 2024
2 checks passed
@netomi
Copy link
Contributor

netomi commented Feb 7, 2024

changes are live.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants