Match any file with the extensions in any directory #78
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file Changes
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/validate_esphome_beta.yml (1)
11-14: Consider adding branch restrictionsThe AI summary notes that branch restrictions were removed. Consider whether this is intentional, as running the full validation workflow on all branches might consume unnecessary GitHub Actions minutes.
You might want to add branch restrictions to limit the workflow to:
on: push: branches: - main - dev - 'releases/**' paths: - "**/*.{yml,yaml,h,cpp,c,py}"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/validate_esphome_beta.yml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/validate_esphome_beta.yml (1)
11-11: Verify the broader scope of workflow triggers
The new path pattern **/*.{yml,yaml,h,cpp,c,py} will trigger the workflow for any matching file across all directories. This is a valid change that aligns with the PR objective, but please verify:
- That all these file types should trigger the full validation workflow
- Whether we need additional file types (e.g., header files with different extensions)
- If any directories should be excluded (e.g.,
examples/,docs/)
Also applies to: 14-14
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the repository structure and the specific files that would trigger this workflow.
The workflow trigger pattern is appropriate for this repository
Based on the analysis of the repository structure and file types:
-
The pattern correctly covers all relevant file types:
- YAML files (
.yml,.yaml) for ESPHome configurations in root andESPHome/directory - C++ header (
.h) and source (.cpp) files incomponents/tx_ultimate_easy/ - Python (
.py) files for component implementation
- YAML files (
-
The pattern is well-scoped because:
- All matching files are directly related to the ESPHome functionality
- Documentation (
.md), assets (.png,.webp), and version files don't trigger the workflow - No irrelevant directories need to be excluded as the repository is focused on ESPHome configuration
-
No additional file extensions need to be included as all source code and configuration files are covered by the current pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze the types of files that would trigger this workflow
# Find all unique file extensions in the repository
echo "Unique file extensions in the repository:"
find . -type f -name "*.*" | sed 's/.*\.//' | sort -u
# Count files that would trigger the workflow
echo -e "\nFiles that would trigger the workflow:"
for ext in yml yaml h cpp c py; do
count=$(find . -type f -name "*.$ext" | wc -l)
echo "$ext: $count files"
done
Length of output: 1021
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the location and content of source files
echo "=== Python files ==="
find . -type f -name "*.py" -exec ls -l {} \;
echo -e "\n=== C++ and Header files ==="
find . -type f -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -exec ls -l {} \;
echo -e "\n=== YAML files in root and .github ==="
find . -maxdepth 1 -type f -name "*.yml" -o -name "*.yaml" -exec ls -l {} \;
find ./.github -type f -name "*.yml" -o -name "*.yaml" -exec ls -l {} \;
echo -e "\n=== Directory structure ==="
tree -L 2 --dirsfirst
Length of output: 1813
Summary by CodeRabbit