Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

import issue fix #2001

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

import issue fix #2001

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

nabeelmd-eGov
Copy link
Contributor

@nabeelmd-eGov nabeelmd-eGov commented Dec 10, 2024

Choose the appropriate template for your PR:

Feature PR

Feature Request

JIRA ID

Module

Description

Related Issues


Bugfix PR

Bugfix Request

JIRA ID

Module

Description

Root Cause

Related Issues


Release PR

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced date validation for the BoundaryWithDate component, ensuring proper date selection.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved internal state management and date handling logic in the BoundaryWithDate component.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined the useProjectSearchWithBoundary function for better readability and maintainability.

@nabeelmd-eGov nabeelmd-eGov requested a review from a team as a code owner December 10, 2024 05:35
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes primarily involve modifications to the BoundaryWithDate component and the useProjectSearchWithBoundary hook. In BoundaryWithDate, the import statements have been updated, and the internal state management has been streamlined, particularly in the useEffect hook. The date validation logic has been enhanced to ensure proper handling of start and end dates. Meanwhile, useProjectSearchWithBoundary now declares the url variable locally within the map function, improving its structure while maintaining its functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
.../BoundaryWithDate.js Updated import statements; streamlined internal state management; refined date validation logic in rendering; JSX structure improved.
.../useProjectSearchWithBoundary.js Localized url variable declaration within the map function; maintained asynchronous requests and overall structure.

Possibly related PRs

  • updated summary redirection #1488: The BoundarySummary component has been updated to include a new variable, hierarchyType, which is relevant to the changes made in the BoundaryWithDate component regarding date handling and validation.
  • added heading to the popup #1526: The BoundaryDetailsSummary component now receives a hierarchyType prop, which connects to the changes in BoundaryWithDate that involve date validation and management.
  • added condition for update #1541: The UpdateBoundary component's modifications in handling campaign updates may relate to the date management logic in BoundaryWithDate, particularly in how dates are validated and processed.
  • changes in the delivery type and selection of boundary #1816: The changes in the SelectingBoundaryComponent regarding boundary selection logic may relate to the BoundaryWithDate component's handling of date-related state and validation.
  • fixed draft issue #1757: The CycleConfiguration updates may connect to the date management aspects of the BoundaryWithDate component, especially in terms of how cycles and dates are validated and processed.

Suggested reviewers

  • nipunarora-eGov

🐇 In the garden where dates align,
A boundary set, so pure, divine.
With cycles turning, all in place,
Clarity blooms, a gentle grace.
The project flows, as we refine,
A hop, a skip, in perfect time! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range comments (4)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/BoundaryWithDate.js (4)

Line range hint 10-10: Remove commented out code.

The commented translation hook is redundant as it's already declared above.

-  // const { t } = useTranslation();

Line range hint 29-65: Consider enhancing date validation.

While the current validation checks for undefined dates and comparison with today, consider adding:

  1. Validation for maximum date range to prevent unreasonable future dates
  2. Type checking for the date parameter to prevent potential runtime errors

Example enhancement:

 const handleDateChange = ({ date, endDate = false, cycleDate = false, cycleIndex }) => {
-  if (typeof date === "undefined" || date <= today) {
+  if (!date || typeof date !== 'string' || date <= today || new Date(date) > new Date(today).setFullYear(today.getFullYear() + 1)) {
     return null;
   }
   // ... rest of the function
 };

Line range hint 67-89: Consider using responsive grid values.

The fixed grid template columns might not work well on smaller screens.

-      <LabelFieldPair style={{ display: "grid", gridTemplateColumns: "13rem 2fr", alignItems: "start", gap: "1rem" }}>
+      <LabelFieldPair style={{ display: "grid", gridTemplateColumns: "minmax(13rem, 1fr) 2fr", alignItems: "start", gap: "1rem" }}>

Line range hint 90-159: Consider extracting cycle date validation logic.

The cycle dates section contains complex validation logic that could be extracted into a separate utility function for better maintainability.

Example:

const getCycleDateValidation = (index, cycleDates, startDate, endDate, today) => {
  return {
    min: index > 0 && cycleDates[index - 1]?.endDate
      ? new Date(new Date(cycleDates[index - 1].endDate).getTime() + ONE_DAY_IN_MS)
          .toISOString()
          .split("T")[0]
      : today >= startDate
      ? today
      : startDate,
    max: endDate,
  };
};

Then use it in the FieldV1 components:

 populators={{
-  validation: {
-    min: index > 0 && !isNaN(new Date(cycleDates?.find((j) => j.cycleIndex == index)?.endDate)?.getTime())
-      ? new Date(new Date(cycleDates?.find((j) => j.cycleIndex == index)?.endDate)?.getTime() + ONE_DAY_IN_MS)
-          ?.toISOString()
-          ?.split("T")?.[0]
-      : today >= startDate
-      ? today
-      : startDate,
-    max: endDate,
-  },
+  validation: getCycleDateValidation(index, cycleDates, startDate, endDate, today),
 }}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 81fdfaf and 8508587.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/BoundaryWithDate.js (1 hunks)
  • health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useProjectSearchWithBoundary.js (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/hooks/useProjectSearchWithBoundary.js
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/BoundaryWithDate.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

🔇 Additional comments (2)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/BoundaryWithDate.js (2)

4-5: LGTM! Import statements are properly organized.

The imports are correctly structured and all imported components are used within the file.


Line range hint 11-27: LGTM! State and effect management is well implemented.

The state initialization and effect hook properly handle:

  • Project start/end dates with null safety
  • Cycle dates transformation and initialization

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants