Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update processTrackUtils.ts #989

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ashish-egov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent update to processTrackUtils.ts mainly focuses on refactoring the returned object in the getProcessDetails function. The changes involve renaming certain object properties and removing the old ones before returning the result. This restructuring is aimed at improving code clarity and maintainability.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summary
utilities/.../utils/processTrackUtils.ts Restructured return object in getProcessDetails by renaming properties and deleting old ones.

Poem

In the world of code so fair and bright,

We tweak and change, day and night,

Renaming fields, deleting old,

Our functions now more clearly told.

Sweet success in structured form,

The utility dances in reform!


Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are currently opted into early access features by default.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9e0f059 and 315fbb6.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/processTrackUtils.ts (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/processTrackUtils.ts

[error] 23-23: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.

(lint/style/noUselessElse)


[error] 25-36: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.

(lint/style/noUselessElse)


[error] 28-28: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 30-30: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 32-32: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 34-34: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

Additional comments not posted (1)
utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/processTrackUtils.ts (1)

66-66: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

else {
const result = queryResponse.rows[0];
result.campaignId = result.campaignid;
delete result.campaignid;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Avoid using the delete operator.

The delete operator can impact performance. Use undefined assignments instead.

- delete result.campaignid;
+ result.campaignid = undefined;

- delete result.additionaldetails;
+ result.additionaldetails = undefined;

- delete result.createdtime;
+ result.createdtime = undefined;

- delete result.lastmodifiedtime;
+ result.lastmodifiedtime = undefined;

Also applies to: 30-30, 32-32, 34-34

Tools
Biome

[error] 28-28: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

@@ -22,7 +22,18 @@
}
else return {};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove redundant else clause.

The else clause can be omitted because the previous branch returns early.

- else {
    // code
  }

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Tools
Biome

[error] 23-23: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.

(lint/style/noUselessElse)

Comment on lines +25 to +36
else {
const result = queryResponse.rows[0];
result.campaignId = result.campaignid;
delete result.campaignid;
result.additionalDetails = result.additionaldetails;
delete result.additionaldetails;
result.createdTime = result.createdtime;
delete result.createdtime;
result.lastModifiedTime = result.lastmodifiedtime;
delete result.lastmodifiedtime;
return result;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove redundant else clause.

The else clause can be omitted because the previous branch returns early.

- else {
    const result = queryResponse.rows[0];
    result.campaignId = result.campaignid;
    delete result.campaignid;
    result.additionalDetails = result.additionaldetails;
    delete result.additionaldetails;
    result.createdTime = result.createdtime;
    delete result.createdtime;
    result.lastModifiedTime = result.lastmodifiedtime;
    delete result.lastmodifiedtime;
    return result;
  }
+ const result = queryResponse.rows[0];
+ result.campaignId = result.campaignid;
+ delete result.campaignid;
+ result.additionalDetails = result.additionaldetails;
+ delete result.additionaldetails;
+ result.createdTime = result.createdtime;
+ delete result.createdtime;
+ result.lastModifiedTime = result.lastmodifiedtime;
+ delete result.lastmodifiedtime;
+ return result;
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
else {
const result = queryResponse.rows[0];
result.campaignId = result.campaignid;
delete result.campaignid;
result.additionalDetails = result.additionaldetails;
delete result.additionaldetails;
result.createdTime = result.createdtime;
delete result.createdtime;
result.lastModifiedTime = result.lastmodifiedtime;
delete result.lastmodifiedtime;
return result;
}
const result = queryResponse.rows[0];
result.campaignId = result.campaignid;
delete result.campaignid;
result.additionalDetails = result.additionaldetails;
delete result.additionaldetails;
result.createdTime = result.createdtime;
delete result.createdtime;
result.lastModifiedTime = result.lastmodifiedtime;
delete result.lastmodifiedtime;
return result;
Tools
Biome

[error] 25-36: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.

(lint/style/noUselessElse)


[error] 28-28: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 30-30: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 32-32: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 34-34: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov merged commit f19841d into campaign Jul 1, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov deleted the ashish-egov-patch-2 branch July 1, 2024 05:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants