Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixs #990

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

fixs #990

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

Bhavya-egov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The SelectingBoundaries.js file in the campaign-manager module has been updated to refine how the lowestHierarchy is determined. The new approach uses the find method to identify the appropriate element, offering a more dynamic and potentially accurate way to calculate lowestHierarchy compared to directly accessing the first array element.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.../campaign-manager/src/components/SelectingBoundaries.js Modified the calculation of lowestHierarchy by utilizing the find method instead of direct array element access.

Poem

In code's vast field, a tweak we'll find,
To search with find, both bold and kind.
Not first in line, but best we'll chase,
For hierarchies in their right place.
A boundary shift, a coder's cheer,
Our campaigns now, more clear, sincere.
🎉✨🐇


Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are currently opted into early access features by default.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/SelectingBoundaries.js (10)

Line range hint 30-31: Use optional chaining for safer property access.

Change the property access to use optional chaining to avoid potential errors.

- const lowestChild = hierarchyTypeDataresult?.boundaryHierarchy.filter((item) => item.parentBoundaryType === lowestHierarchy)?.[0]?.boundaryType;
+ const lowestChild = hierarchyTypeDataresult?.boundaryHierarchy?.filter((item) => item.parentBoundaryType === lowestHierarchy)?.[0]?.boundaryType;

Line range hint 356-356: Avoid using hasOwnProperty directly from target object.

It's recommended to use Object.hasOwn() instead.

- if (type !== boundary?.boundaryType && updatedBoundaryData?.hasOwnProperty(type)) {
+ if (type !== boundary?.boundaryType && Object.hasOwn(updatedBoundaryData, type)) {

Line range hint 369-372: Use optional chaining for safer property access.

Change the property access to use optional chaining to avoid potential errors.

- const boundaryWithTypeNullParent = hierarchyTypeDataresult?.boundaryHierarchy?.find((boundary) => boundary?.parentBoundaryType === null);
+ const boundaryWithTypeNullParent = hierarchyTypeDataresult?.boundaryHierarchy?.find((boundary) => boundary?.parentBoundaryType === null);

Line range hint 409-411: Omit unnecessary else clause.

The else clause can be omitted because the previous branches break early.

- } else {
-   transformedRes = filteredData;
- }
+ transformedRes = filteredData;

Line range hint 419-419: Avoid unsafe usage of optional chaining.

Ensure that the optional chaining does not short-circuit to undefined, which would cause a TypeError.

- const parentBoundaryEntry = hierarchyTypeDataresult ? hierarchyTypeDataresult?.boundaryHierarchy?.find((e) => e?.parentBoundaryType === res?.[0]?.boundaryType || e?.parentBoundaryType === res?.[0]?.type) : null;
+ const parentBoundaryEntry = hierarchyTypeDataresult?.boundaryHierarchy?.find((e) => e?.parentBoundaryType === res?.[0]?.boundaryType || e?.parentBoundaryType === res?.[0]?.type) ?? null;

Line range hint 534-534: Add key property for elements in iterable.

The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.

- <div>
+ <div key="info-card-text">

Line range hint 548-548: Avoid passing children using a prop.

The canonical way to pass children in React is to use JSX elements.

- children={[
+ <div key="popup-children">

Line range hint 549-549: Add key property for elements in iterable.

The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.

- <div>
+ <div key="popup-text">

Line range hint 557-565: Add key property for elements in iterable.

The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.

- <Button
+ <Button key="popup-button-back"

Line range hint 566-574: Add key property for elements in iterable.

The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.

- <Button
+ <Button key="popup-button-submit"
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f19841d and cf144a6.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/SelectingBoundaries.js (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/SelectingBoundaries.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

Biome
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/campaign-manager/src/components/SelectingBoundaries.js

[error] 30-31: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)


[error] 356-356: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.

It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.

(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)


[error] 369-372: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)


[error] 409-411: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.

(lint/style/noUselessElse)


[error] 419-419: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.

If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:

(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)


[error] 534-534: Missing key property for this element in iterable.

The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)


[error] 548-548: Avoid passing children using a prop

The canonical way to pass children in React is to use JSX elements

(lint/correctness/noChildrenProp)


[error] 549-549: Missing key property for this element in iterable.

The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)


[error] 557-565: Missing key property for this element in iterable.

The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)


[error] 566-574: Missing key property for this element in iterable.

The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)

@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov merged commit 69dfe1a into campaign Jul 1, 2024
2 of 4 checks passed
@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov deleted the change branch July 1, 2024 07:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants