Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added timeout of 2 sec for boundary entity to persist #996

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

nitish-egov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A 2-second delay has been introduced before creating boundary relationships within the autoGenerateBoundaryCodes function in campaignUtils.ts to ensure the proper persistence of boundary entities. This change ensures that all boundary entities are settled before establishing their relationships, preventing potential issues related to premature relationship creation.

Changes

Files Change Summary
utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignUtils.ts Added a 2-second delay in autoGenerateBoundaryCodes function before creating boundary relationships.

Poem

In the code, a pause, a gentle stay,
Before links form, a brief delay. ⏳
Two seconds of time, a bound to wait,
Ensures all entities settle and relate.
Relations bloom in perfect sync,
A seamless dance, no missing link. 🌐


Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are currently opted into early access features by default.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignUtils.ts (4)

Line range hint 415-415: Variable declaration should be at the function root

For better readability and to adhere to best practices, variables should be declared at the root of the function. This helps in understanding the variable's scope and lifetime more easily.

+ var columns;
function findColumns(worksheet: any) {
    const range = {
        s: { r: 0, c: 0 },
        e: { r: worksheet.rowCount - 1, c: worksheet.columnCount - 1 }
    };

    // Check if the status column already exists in the first row
-   var columns = {}
+   columns = {}

Line range hint 545-545: Consider replacing delete with assignment to undefined

The use of the delete operator can lead to performance issues as it modifies the underlying object's shape. Instead, assigning undefined is often more performant and should be considered here.

- delete request.body.CampaignDetails.campaignDetails;
+ request.body.CampaignDetails.campaignDetails = undefined;

Also applies to: 574-574, 576-576, 614-614, 616-616, 617-617, 874-874, 881-881, 882-882, 883-883, 884-884


Line range hint 759-761: Redundant else clause can be omitted

The else clause here is redundant because the preceding if block contains a return statement, making the else unnecessary. Removing it can simplify the code.

- else {
-     throwError("COMMON", 500, "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", "There is no root boundary for this campaign.");
- }
+ throwError("COMMON", 500, "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR", "There is no root boundary for this campaign.");

Line range hint 632-635: Declare variables at the function root

Variables should be declared at the top of their function to avoid confusion about their scope and to comply with JavaScript best practices.

+ var boundaryChildren;
function addBoundaries(request: any, boundaryResponse: any, boundaryChildren: any) {
-   var boundaryChildren = boundaries.reduce((acc: any, boundary: any) => {
+   boundaryChildren = boundaries.reduce((acc: any, boundary: any) => {
        acc[boundary.code] = boundary?.includeAllChildren;
        return acc;
    }, {});
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 69456ac and 8bbf277.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignUtils.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignUtils.ts

[error] 415-415: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.

The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.

(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)


[error] 451-451: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.

If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:

(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)


[error] 502-502: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.

If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:

(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)


[error] 545-545: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 574-574: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 576-576: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 614-614: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 616-616: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 617-617: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 632-635: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.

The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.

(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)


[error] 649-649: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.

The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.

(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)


[error] 759-761: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.

(lint/style/noUselessElse)


[error] 874-874: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 881-881: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 882-882: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 883-883: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 884-884: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 1078-1078: Unsafe usage of optional chaining.

If it short-circuits with 'undefined' the evaluation will throw TypeError here:

(lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining)


[error] 1100-1103: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.

The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.

(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)


[error] 1104-1104: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.

The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.

(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)

Additional comments not posted (2)
utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignUtils.ts (2)

1595-1596: Add a delay to ensure boundary entities are persisted

The addition of a 2-second delay before creating boundary relationships is a straightforward approach to ensure that boundary entities are properly persisted. This is a valid solution if the persistence layer requires some time to commit transactions or if there's asynchronous processing involved.


Line range hint 1078-1078: Check for potential TypeError due to unsafe optional chaining

There's a potential issue where the use of optional chaining (?.) could result in a TypeError if it short-circuits to undefined. This should be checked and handled appropriately.

Verification successful

No TypeError due to unsafe optional chaining

The use of optional chaining for request?.body?.CampaignDetails is handled with appropriate checks and default value assignments throughout the file. This ensures that the potential TypeError is mitigated.

  • Location: utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignUtils.ts
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the handling of undefined values in optional chaining.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'$_?.[0]?.url'

Length of output: 2230



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the usage of request?.body?.CampaignDetails in the specified file and line range.
rg --pcre2 --context 5 'request\?\.\body\?\.\CampaignDetails' utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignUtils.ts

Length of output: 123



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the usage of CampaignDetails in the specified file to understand its context.
rg --pcre2 --context 5 'CampaignDetails' utilities/project-factory/src/server/utils/campaignUtils.ts

Length of output: 27296

@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov merged commit ce9cf6a into campaign Jul 1, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov deleted the timeout branch July 1, 2024 12:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants