-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Last tracker hits not used in CKF #1659
Labels
topic: tracking
Relates to tracking reconstruction
Comments
@simonge suggested me to check the phi distribution of TOF. While that looks alright, the outer MPGD missing hits definitely have some pattern. @mposik1983 any thoughts? |
Hi Shujie, thanks for looking at this. Do you happen to have the comparisons for theta, x,y, and z distributions?
…________________________________
From: ShujieL ***@***.***>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2024 1:52:07 AM
To: eic/EICrecon ***@***.***>
Cc: Matthew Posik ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: [External] Re: [eic/EICrecon] Last tracker hits not used in CKF (Issue #1659)
@simonge<https://github.com/simonge> suggested me to check the phi distribution of TOF. While that looks alright, the outer MPGD missing hits definitely have some pattern.
@mposik1983<https://github.com/mposik1983> any thoughts?
Screenshot.2024-10-30.at.22.48.51.png (view on web)<https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa22520e-7f75-44e8-b02a-2693a5b1367a>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1659 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQ7622PTRSCWEOTPOFQKSDZ6HAQPAVCNFSM6AAAAABQ3H3OVGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINBZGA2TIMJXHE>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
@mposik1983 Here's the z distribution |
Hi Shujie,
Thanks. So based on these distributions it looks like the hits are only being accepted around the detector perimeter, and hits are missing in the central area of the detector. I imagine if you look at theta vs. phi 2D distribution of the measurements you will see "holes" in the central of the detector planes. This to me smells like a bug in the ACTS detector implementation. I will relay these distributions at Mondays MPGD meeting.
Matt Posik
Research Associate Professor
Temple University
Department of Physics
SERC
1925 N. 12th St.
Philadelphia, PA 19122
USA
TU Office: SERC Room 451
Physics Office: SERC Room 406/4th Floor
…________________________________
From: ShujieL ***@***.***>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2024 4:57 PM
To: eic/EICrecon ***@***.***>
Cc: Matthew Posik ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: [External] Re: [eic/EICrecon] Last tracker hits not used in CKF (Issue #1659)
@mposik1983<https://github.com/mposik1983> Here's the z distribution
Screenshot.2024-10-31.at.13.55.43.png (view on web)<https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e04ac4f4-3752-4984-8f0d-613a6695f942>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1659 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQ762ZSYJVPKYILBH46LDLZ6KKUPAVCNFSM6AAAAABQ3H3OVGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINJQHAYDGMJRGU>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 4, 2024
### Briefly, what does this PR introduce? Changes the name of the BTOF hit collections to use Hits instead of Hit. This was inconsistent between the name output from the hit reconstruction and collection collector input. ### What kind of change does this PR introduce? - [x] Bug fix (issue #1659 probably some of the cause at least) - [ ] New feature (issue #__) - [ ] Documentation update - [ ] Other: __ ### Please check if this PR fulfills the following: - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added - [ ] Documentation has been added / updated - [ ] Changes have been communicated to collaborators ### Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code? No ### Does this PR change default behavior? Hopefully adds the BTOF into the tracking
5 tasks
The issue with missing measurement hits has been fixed in PR#800 of the epic repository. |
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
to eic/epic
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2024
### Briefly, what does this PR introduce? Fixes the [issue #1659 in EICrecon](eic/EICrecon#1659) where the last tracker hit was not being used in CKF. [2024_11_06.pdf](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17661610/2024_11_06.pdf) ### What kind of change does this PR introduce? - [ x] Bug fix: [EICrecon issue#1659](eic/EICrecon#1659) - [ ] New feature (issue #__) - [ ] Documentation update - [ ] Other: __ ### Please check if this PR fulfills the following: - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added - [ ] Documentation has been added / updated - [x ] Changes have been communicated to collaborators ### Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code? No breaking changes. Analyzers will now see all outer barrel MPGD hits included in the CKF. ### Does this PR change default behavior? No
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
to eic/epic
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2024
### Briefly, what does this PR introduce? Fixes the [issue #1659 in EICrecon](eic/EICrecon#1659) where the last tracker hit was not being used in CKF. [2024_11_06.pdf](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17661610/2024_11_06.pdf) ### What kind of change does this PR introduce? - [ x] Bug fix: [EICrecon issue#1659](eic/EICrecon#1659) - [ ] New feature (issue #__) - [ ] Documentation update - [ ] Other: __ ### Please check if this PR fulfills the following: - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added - [ ] Documentation has been added / updated - [x ] Changes have been communicated to collaborators ### Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code? No breaking changes. Analyzers will now see all outer barrel MPGD hits included in the CKF. ### Does this PR change default behavior? No
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
to eic/epic
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2024
### Briefly, what does this PR introduce? Fixes the [issue #1659 in EICrecon](eic/EICrecon#1659) where the last tracker hit was not being used in CKF. [2024_11_06.pdf](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17661610/2024_11_06.pdf) ### What kind of change does this PR introduce? - [ x] Bug fix: [EICrecon issue#1659](eic/EICrecon#1659) - [ ] New feature (issue #__) - [ ] Documentation update - [ ] Other: __ ### Please check if this PR fulfills the following: - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added - [ ] Documentation has been added / updated - [x ] Changes have been communicated to collaborators ### Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code? No breaking changes. Analyzers will now see all outer barrel MPGD hits included in the CKF. ### Does this PR change default behavior? No
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to eic/epic
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2024
### Briefly, what does this PR introduce? Fixes the [issue #1659 in EICrecon](eic/EICrecon#1659) where the last tracker hit was not being used in CKF. [2024_11_06.pdf](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17661610/2024_11_06.pdf) ### What kind of change does this PR introduce? - [ x] Bug fix: [EICrecon issue#1659](eic/EICrecon#1659) - [ ] New feature (issue #__) - [ ] Documentation update - [ ] Other: __ ### Please check if this PR fulfills the following: - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added - [ ] Documentation has been added / updated - [x ] Changes have been communicated to collaborators ### Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code? No breaking changes. Analyzers will now see all outer barrel MPGD hits included in the CKF. ### Does this PR change default behavior? No (cherry picked from commit d491ba7)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Environment: (where does this bug occur, have you tried other environments)
main branch. v24.09
Steps to reproduce: (give a step by step account of how to trigger the bug)
Expected Result: (what do you expect when you execute the steps above)
The number of events with digitized hits on the last layer should equal (up to the efficiency) to the number of tracks reconstructed with a measurement on the last layer
Actual Result: (what do you get when you execute the steps above)
Attached are the comparison of sim hits, digi hits, and measurement on each layer from
EPIC/RECO/24.09.0/epic_craterlake/SINGLE/pi+/10GeV/45to135deg/pi+_10GeV_45to135deg.0001.eicrecon.tree.edm4eic.root
While most of the MPGD hits are digitized after the threshold change at eic/epic#774, only half of those hits are used in track recon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: