-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Syntax: improve elixirExUnitMacro #424
Closed
+12
−1
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another idea would be to use negative lookaround for the
:
character to make sure it's not an atom. I've done that frequently in the indent code (example: https://github.com/elixir-editors/vim-elixir/blob/master/autoload/elixir/indent.vim#L112). That would avoid the parenthesis changeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But that would leave us with
setup()
beinging highlighted as macro.Basically I try to distinguish between 3 cases:
test ...
,test()
, andtest:
. I know the issue is just about thetest:
case, but I guess functions namedtest()
orsetup()
are not too uncommon.So.. assuming that the ExUnit macro is always followed by space, we can either add a space at the end of the regex or use that negative lookaround like
\[:\(]\@!
. The outcome is the same.I guess the question if we think that functions named
test()
are more common than the ExUnit macrotest
with parentheses. (I never saw the latter so far.)Or we choose not to highlight ExUnit macros at all. That would avoid any tradeoffs. :-P
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Been thinking about this a lot lately - I'd definitely be in favor of a configurable list of macros (issue #432). Then we can get out of that business and everyone can just pick what they want 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I somehow missed that response. I agree! Closing this in favor of #432