Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: ignore vulnerabilities on license scan #4895

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

shahar-h
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:
Ignore vulnerabilities on osv-scanner license scan, since we already have vulnerabilities scan.

Release Notes: No

@shahar-h shahar-h requested a review from a team as a code owner December 11, 2024 20:49
Signed-off-by: Shahar Harari <[email protected]>
osv-scanner.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Shahar Harari <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.29%. Comparing base (2385672) to head (c588ea4).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4895      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.25%   66.29%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         209      209              
  Lines       31922    31922              
==========================================
+ Hits        21149    21163      +14     
+ Misses       9524     9512      -12     
+ Partials     1249     1247       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@arkodg arkodg requested review from a team December 11, 2024 21:10
@zirain zirain merged commit f467007 into envoyproxy:main Dec 12, 2024
24 checks passed
@shahar-h shahar-h deleted the ignore-vulns-on-license-scan branch December 12, 2024 04:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants