-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(modem): host test support of the latest ESP-IDF release (IDF-7828) #454
Conversation
c9afe4a
to
114e1cb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM in general.
It only seems like the tests were not executed?
https://github.com/espressif/esp-protocols/actions/runs/7131318373/job/19419621023?pr=454#step:6:386
compared to the master pipeline:
https://github.com/espressif/esp-protocols/actions/runs/7112254051/job/19361852029#step:6:321
the new test has no output, is it because of the new catch?
c7f8fc0
to
c4d6b50
Compare
Yes in new Catch2 when the result is being redirected with |
LGTM if the output is captured in |
d9417e0
to
ba008fe
Compare
https://github.com/espressif/esp-protocols/actions/runs/7666426164/job/20894215662#step:6:413 |
eeb99fe
to
619a784
Compare
@david-cermak I added The log is here |
e569dee
to
f7db79a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM otherwise
64981c9
to
4cb6fb3
Compare
e29fdf2
to
54bd546
Compare
1cb51dc
to
229217a
Compare
@david-cermak PTAL on your first convenience. |
229217a
to
5f51d48
Compare
f508360
to
a8d9edf
Compare
a8d9edf
to
2cc974c
Compare
…4, Ubuntu 20.04 to v22.04
2cc974c
to
a23a002
Compare
@@ -51,14 +57,19 @@ jobs: | |||
# The sdkconfig.ci.linux specifies Linux as the build target with apropriate settings. | |||
cp sdkconfig.ci.linux sdkconfig.defaults | |||
idf.py build | |||
./build/${{inputs.app_name}}.elf -r junit -o junit.xml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a reusable action, correct? Wouldn't we miss the junit outputs for the websocket and mdns host tests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@david-cermak good point. I will modify and fix it in another PR. I'll address and resolve it in a subsequent pull request. As today I noticed a problem with the package upgrade for the mDNS test, but I believe the second commit in this pull request will fix the issue.
Thank you for your review!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just one last final question. It's okay to just run the related tests to see if it didn't break anything...
No description provided.