Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(common): Add clang tidy check to esp-protocols #545

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2024

Conversation

david-cermak
Copy link
Collaborator

@david-cermak david-cermak commented Apr 5, 2024

TODO

@david-cermak david-cermak self-assigned this Apr 5, 2024
@david-cermak david-cermak force-pushed the feat/clang_tidy_check branch 2 times, most recently from d9c30ba to 00bfb5c Compare April 5, 2024 10:58
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@david-cermak
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@euripedesrocha @suren-gabrielyan-espressif PTAL, I'm thinking of resolving the TODO list above separately (creating a tracker and fixing later), so that we can have some static analysis running for our components.

@david-cermak david-cermak force-pushed the feat/clang_tidy_check branch from 7779559 to eb84eed Compare April 26, 2024 10:40
@david-cermak david-cermak merged commit f4bdf0a into espressif:master May 9, 2024
31 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants