Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update MEV-relay-list.md #103

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

sambacha
Copy link

@sambacha sambacha commented Mar 29, 2024

The 'major incident' was a hack, which by the way revealed two underlying bugs with the flashbots relay. We were paid the only bounty flashbots has paid out ever in disclosing and fixing this bug as well.

Additionally, there have been other outages at Flashbots, Bloxroute, etc. It does not seem fair to only include our outage, which was a total of 7 ETH whereas Flashbots had over $20mil in their incident last May.

I added more information about running your own validator successfully and made note of a new Relay we are launching on mainnet this coming April (its on Holesky). as well as updated our holesky relay.

@remyroy
Copy link
Member

remyroy commented Mar 29, 2024

We want to preserve and document all historic incidents regarding MEV relays. We are happy to add more incidents and references to pertinent documents about them.

Various clients are implementing boost configurations. It would be nice to describe it in details for each client.

I'm not sure about the need to add a seperate section for MEV Auction since it's the same endpoint as the regular one for Holesky.

If you want to rework this PR, I would be happy to include the rest.

@sambacha
Copy link
Author

We want to preserve and document all historic incidents regarding MEV relays. We are happy to add more incidents and references to pertinent documents about them.

Various clients are implementing boost configurations. It would be nice to describe it in details for each client.

I'm not sure about the need to add a seperate section for MEV Auction since it's the same same endpoint as the regular one for Holesky.

If you want to rework this PR, I would be happy to include the rest.

Please suggest some criteria for the incident details needed

@remyroy
Copy link
Member

remyroy commented Apr 26, 2024

I think a link to the post-mortem, a link to a summary or a link to any objective analysis of the incident would be enough in most cases.

@remyroy
Copy link
Member

remyroy commented Jan 6, 2025

Continued in #123

@remyroy remyroy closed this Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants