Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove rocketpool from staking page [Fixes #5633] #5635

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tsudmi
Copy link
Contributor

@tsudmi tsudmi commented Mar 9, 2022

Description

Related Issue

@gatsby-cloud
Copy link

gatsby-cloud bot commented Mar 9, 2022

Gatsby Cloud Build Report

ethereum-org-website-dev

🎉 Your build was successful! See the Deploy preview here.

Build Details

View the build logs here.

🕐 Build time: 13m

Performance

Lighthouse report

Metric Score
Performance 🔶 25
Accessibility 💚 97
Best Practices 💚 93
SEO 🔶 85

🔗 View full report

@djrtwo
Copy link
Contributor

djrtwo commented Mar 9, 2022

I agree that rocketpool should not be independently highlighted like this on the ethereum.org website.
I think the page should either give a better range of possibilities or not address the issue at all

@jyturley
Copy link

jyturley commented Mar 9, 2022

Why not add other options instead of removing options here? Plus, I don't think we should shy away from any data that would promote decentralization.

@NessDan
Copy link

NessDan commented Mar 10, 2022

Rocket pool is currently the best option for a truly decentralized pool. I think adding others that fit the criteria is fair, but the rest are either permissioned or DAO controlled (unless there's an alternative I'm forgetting?)

@minimalsm
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, @tsudmi @djrtwo @jyturley @NessDan

To keep things focussed here, let's keep the discussion on the issue itself: #5633

Going to lock conversation here temporarily to keep all thoughts and opinions in one place.

@ethereum ethereum locked as off-topic and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 10, 2022
@minimalsm
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in #5633, we have decided not to move forward with this PR. For more information on our plans to address these concerns and the staking page, please check out #5647.

We appreciate all the feedback given to make ethereum.org better 🙏

@minimalsm minimalsm closed this Mar 23, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the abandoned This has been abandoned or will not be implemented label Mar 23, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
abandoned This has been abandoned or will not be implemented
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants