Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add page on proof-of-stake FAQs #8557

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 7, 2022
Merged

add page on proof-of-stake FAQs #8557

merged 9 commits into from
Dec 7, 2022

Conversation

jmcook1186
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Adds a page on proof-of-stake FAQs as part of post-merge gaps epic.

Related Issue

#8285

@gatsby-cloud
Copy link

gatsby-cloud bot commented Nov 10, 2022

✅ ethereum-org-website-dev deploy preview ready

Copy link
Contributor

@minimalsm minimalsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Incomplete review, but left a few questions / suggestions.

Looking good overall :-)


Proof-of-stake requires nodes, known as validators, to explicitly submit a crypto asset to a smart contract. If they misbehave then this crypto can be destroyed. This is a direct "staking" of assets directly into the chain, rather indirectly via energy expenditure.

Proof-of-work is much more energy-hungry because electricity is burned in the mining process. Proof-of-stake, on the other hand, requires only a very small amount of energy - Ethereum validators cna even run on a low-powered device such as Raspberry Pi. Ethereum's proof-of-stake mechanism is thought to be more secure than proof-of-work because the cost to attack is greater, and the consequences to an attacker are more severe.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ethereum's proof-of-stake mechanism is thought to be more secure than proof-of-work because the cost to attack is greater, and the consequences to an attacker are more severe.

  • is thought to be

Can/should we use stronger language here? If we have a resource we trust, I think we should be able to make definitive statements if we believe them to be true.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

idk, i think until pos has been operational for a longer time and shaken off a few attacks, "thought to be" is better. Just my opinion.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

idk, i think until pos has been operational for a longer time and shaken off a few attacks, "thought to be" is better. Just my opinion.

Fair enough. We've made our bed, so let's hope it's more secure 😆

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In a few years, I wonder if a lack of attacks is a testament to EthPoS security (i.e. will there be fewer attacks because of economic incentives?)


## Do the rich get richer in proof-of-stake? {#do-rich-get-richer}

Yes, in the sense that the more ETH someone has to stake, the more validators they can run and therefore the more rewards they can accrue. The rewards scale linearly with the amount of staked ETH and everyone gets the same percentage return. Proof-of-work enriches the rich more than proof-of-stake does because richer miners that buy hardware at scale benefit from economies of scale, meaning the relationship between wealth and reward is non-linear.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Yes, in the sense that the more ETH someone has to stake, the more validators they can run and therefore the more rewards they can accrue. The rewards scale linearly with the amount of staked ETH and everyone gets the same percentage return. Proof-of-work enriches the rich more than proof-of-stake does because richer miners that buy hardware at scale benefit from economies of scale, meaning the relationship between wealth and reward is non-linear.
The more ETH someone has to stake, the more validators they can run, and the more rewards they can accrue. The rewards scale linearly with the amount of staked ETH, and everyone gets the same percentage return. Proof-of-work enriches the rich more than proof-of-stake because richer miners that buy hardware at scale benefit from economies of scale, meaning the relationship between wealth and reward is non-linear.

@minimalsm minimalsm merged commit 856e9be into dev Dec 7, 2022
@minimalsm minimalsm deleted the jc-pos-faqs branch December 7, 2022 13:14
@corwintines corwintines mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content 🖋️ This involves copy additions or edits
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants