-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add page on proof-of-stake FAQs #8557
Conversation
✅ ethereum-org-website-dev deploy preview ready
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Incomplete review, but left a few questions / suggestions.
Looking good overall :-)
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
Proof-of-stake requires nodes, known as validators, to explicitly submit a crypto asset to a smart contract. If they misbehave then this crypto can be destroyed. This is a direct "staking" of assets directly into the chain, rather indirectly via energy expenditure. | ||
|
||
Proof-of-work is much more energy-hungry because electricity is burned in the mining process. Proof-of-stake, on the other hand, requires only a very small amount of energy - Ethereum validators cna even run on a low-powered device such as Raspberry Pi. Ethereum's proof-of-stake mechanism is thought to be more secure than proof-of-work because the cost to attack is greater, and the consequences to an attacker are more severe. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ethereum's proof-of-stake mechanism is thought to be more secure than proof-of-work because the cost to attack is greater, and the consequences to an attacker are more severe.
- is thought to be
Can/should we use stronger language here? If we have a resource we trust, I think we should be able to make definitive statements if we believe them to be true.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
idk, i think until pos has been operational for a longer time and shaken off a few attacks, "thought to be" is better. Just my opinion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
idk, i think until pos has been operational for a longer time and shaken off a few attacks, "thought to be" is better. Just my opinion.
Fair enough. We've made our bed, so let's hope it's more secure 😆
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In a few years, I wonder if a lack of attacks is a testament to EthPoS security (i.e. will there be fewer attacks because of economic incentives?)
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Joshua <[email protected]>
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Joshua <[email protected]>
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/faqs/index.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
## Do the rich get richer in proof-of-stake? {#do-rich-get-richer} | ||
|
||
Yes, in the sense that the more ETH someone has to stake, the more validators they can run and therefore the more rewards they can accrue. The rewards scale linearly with the amount of staked ETH and everyone gets the same percentage return. Proof-of-work enriches the rich more than proof-of-stake does because richer miners that buy hardware at scale benefit from economies of scale, meaning the relationship between wealth and reward is non-linear. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, in the sense that the more ETH someone has to stake, the more validators they can run and therefore the more rewards they can accrue. The rewards scale linearly with the amount of staked ETH and everyone gets the same percentage return. Proof-of-work enriches the rich more than proof-of-stake does because richer miners that buy hardware at scale benefit from economies of scale, meaning the relationship between wealth and reward is non-linear. | |
The more ETH someone has to stake, the more validators they can run, and the more rewards they can accrue. The rewards scale linearly with the amount of staked ETH, and everyone gets the same percentage return. Proof-of-work enriches the rich more than proof-of-stake because richer miners that buy hardware at scale benefit from economies of scale, meaning the relationship between wealth and reward is non-linear. |
Description
Adds a page on proof-of-stake FAQs as part of post-merge gaps epic.
Related Issue
#8285