Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update Team Member Role #3224

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

fix: update Team Member Role #3224

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

Cedric921
Copy link
Contributor

@Cedric921 Cedric921 commented Nov 3, 2024

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings

Previous screenshots

Please add here videos or images of previous status

Current screenshots

Please add here videos or images of previous status

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved role management for team members, enhancing clarity in promoting and demoting managers.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined logic for updating member roles, ensuring accurate tracking of manager IDs during updates.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the MemberTable component within the apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx file. Key modifications include the renaming of variables related to member IDs and the restructuring of logic for managing team member roles, specifically for promoting and demoting managers. The updates ensure that the handling of member roles is more explicit, improving clarity in the role management process without altering the overall control flow.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx Modified MemberTable logic for managing team member roles, including variable renaming and restructuring role update logic.

Possibly related PRs

  • Feat(app/web): Team Settings | Edit User Role #3153: The changes in this PR introduce a new interface for role management, which is directly related to the updates made in the MemberTable component for managing team member roles, particularly in the context of promoting and demoting managers.

Suggested reviewers

  • evereq
  • EverTechDevOps

Poem

🐇 In the member table, roles take flight,
Managers rise, shining bright.
With clearer paths, we lead the way,
Promoting teams, come what may!
A hop, a skip, in code we trust,
For better roles, adapt we must! 🌟

Warning

There were issues while running the following tools:

🔧 eslint
apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.46.0

ESLint couldn't find the config "next/core-web-vitals" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct.

The config "next/core-web-vitals" was referenced from the config file in "/apps/web/.eslintrc.json".

If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 265e671 and 0e762d3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Cedric921 Cedric921 marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2024 05:14
@Cedric921 Cedric921 self-assigned this Nov 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx (1)

Line range hint 85-101: Critical issues in role change handling.

Several issues need to be addressed:

  1. The function only handles manager role changes but ignores other role updates
  2. Contains debug console.log and commented out code
  3. The member's roleId is not being updated

Consider this implementation:

const handleRoleChange = useCallback((newRole: IRole) => {
  if (!editMemberRef.current || !activeTeamRef.current) return;

- console.log({ newRole })

  const { employeeId, role } = editMemberRef.current;

  const isPromotingToManager = role?.name !== 'MANAGER' && newRole?.name === 'MANAGER';
- handleManagerRoleUpdate(employeeId, isPromotingToManager);
+ // Update manager status if needed
+ await handleManagerRoleUpdate(employeeId, isPromotingToManager);

+ // Update member's role
+ const updatedMember = {
+   ...editMemberRef.current,
+   roleId: newRole.id,
+   role: newRole
+ };
+ updateTeamMember(updatedMember);

- // Update Organization Team
- // const updatedMember = { ...editMemberRef.current, roleId: !isPromotingToManager ? '' :  };
- // updateTeamMember(updatedMember);
  editMemberRef.current = null;

}, [activeTeamRef, handleManagerRoleUpdate, updateTeamMember]);

Also, consider adding error handling:

try {
  await handleManagerRoleUpdate(employeeId, isPromotingToManager);
  // ... rest of the code
} catch (error) {
  console.error('Failed to update member role:', error);
  // Add proper error handling/notification
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f30b12 and 7f17855.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx (1)

Line range hint 62-101: Verify role update handling across the application.

The changes to role management logic could have wider implications.

Let's verify the implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the role management implementation.


Let me try one more time with just the basic file extension.


Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:

Role update implementation is properly handled across the codebase

The changes in the role management logic are consistent with the existing implementation:

  • The handleRoleChange function correctly handles the manager role promotion/demotion through handleManagerRoleUpdate
  • The updateOrganizationTeam function is used consistently across the codebase for team updates, including role changes
  • The role changes are properly synchronized with team member states through the memberIds and managerIds arrays
  • The commented out code for updateTeamMember doesn't impact the functionality as the role update is handled through the team update mechanism
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify role management implementation across the codebase

# Check for other components using updateOrganizationTeam for role updates
echo "Checking for other role update implementations..."
rg -l "updateOrganizationTeam.*role" --type tsx

# Check for components watching member role changes
echo "Checking for components dependent on member roles..."
rg -l "member.*role.*change|role.*changed" --type tsx

# Check for potential race conditions in role updates
echo "Checking for concurrent role update handling..."
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($$$, [$$$role$$$])'

Length of output: 542


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for role-related code patterns with correct file extensions
echo "Checking for role update implementations..."
rg -l "updateOrganizationTeam.*role" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx

echo "Checking for components dependent on member roles..."
rg -l "member.*role.*change|role.*changed" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx

# Look for role-related mutations and state updates
echo "Checking for role-related mutations..."
rg "role.*update|update.*role" -A 3 --type ts --type tsx --type jsx

# Check for role-related hooks and effects
echo "Checking for role-related hooks..."
rg "useEffect.*role|role.*Effect" -A 3 --type ts --type tsx --type jsx

# Search for role-related types and interfaces
echo "Checking role-related types..."
rg "interface.*Role|type.*Role" -A 3 --type ts --type tsx --type jsx

Length of output: 950


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for role-related patterns in all text files
echo "Checking for role update implementations..."
rg "updateOrganizationTeam" -A 3

echo "Checking for role-related state management..."
rg "role.*update|update.*role" -A 3

echo "Checking for role-related types..."
rg "interface.*Role|type.*Role|enum.*Role" -A 3

# Look for files containing role management
echo "Finding files with role management..."
fd -t f -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg "role" -l

Length of output: 40477

apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Cedric921 Cedric921 added Don't Merge Do not merge this PR until label not removed WEB Web app Ever Teams Bug fix labels Nov 11, 2024
Cedric921 and others added 2 commits November 11, 2024 07:36
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx (2)

Line range hint 92-106: Clean up debug code and improve error handling

A few suggestions to improve this function:

  1. Remove the debug console.log statement
  2. Clean up the commented-out code if it's no longer needed
  3. Add error handling for edge cases

Apply these changes:

 const handleRoleChange = useCallback((newRole: IRole) => {
     if (!editMemberRef.current || !activeTeamRef.current) return;
 
-    console.log({ newRole })
+    if (!newRole?.name) {
+        console.error('Invalid role provided');
+        return;
+    }
 
     const { employeeId, role } = editMemberRef.current;
 
     const isPromotingToManager = role?.name !== 'MANAGER' && newRole?.name === 'MANAGER';
     handleManagerRoleUpdate(employeeId, isPromotingToManager);
 
-    // Update Organization Team
-    // const updatedMember = { ...editMemberRef.current, roleId: !isPromotingToManager ? '' :  };
-    // updateTeamMember(updatedMember);
     editMemberRef.current = null;
 
 }, [activeTeamRef, handleManagerRoleUpdate]);
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 74-74: This variable is used before its declaration.

The variable is declared here:

(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)


[error] 76-76: Shouldn't redeclare 'updatedManagerIds'. Consider to delete it or rename it.

'updatedManagerIds' is defined here:

(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)


Line range hint 62-106: Consider architectural improvements for role management

The current role management implementation could benefit from several architectural improvements:

  1. Separation of Concerns: Consider extracting role management logic into a dedicated hook (e.g., useRoleManagement) to improve maintainability and reusability.
  2. Race Condition Prevention: The current use of refs could lead to race conditions. Consider using state management or a proper loading state.
  3. Error Handling: Add proper error handling with user feedback for failed role updates.

Would you like me to help create a dedicated hook for role management that addresses these concerns?

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 74-74: This variable is used before its declaration.

The variable is declared here:

(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)


[error] 76-76: Shouldn't redeclare 'updatedManagerIds'. Consider to delete it or rename it.

'updatedManagerIds' is defined here:

(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7f17855 and 265e671.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx

[error] 74-74: This variable is used before its declaration.

The variable is declared here:

(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)

apps/web/lib/settings/member-table.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Cedric921 Cedric921 removed the Don't Merge Do not merge this PR until label not removed label Nov 14, 2024
@evereq evereq merged commit 3b1c019 into develop Nov 14, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
@evereq evereq deleted the fix/user-role branch November 14, 2024 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants