[Feature] Show | Edit project information in the task details page #3347
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several enhancements to the API and components related to organization projects. New Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsxOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.46.0 ESLint couldn't find the config "next/core-web-vitals" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "next/core-web-vitals" was referenced from the config file in "/apps/web/.eslintrc.json". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
CREDO23
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
apps/web/app/services/client/api/organization-projects.ts (2)
18-22: Consider adding error handling documentationWhile the implementation is correct, it would be helpful to document potential error cases (e.g., project not found, unauthorized access) to guide API consumers.
Add JSDoc comments like:
+/** + * Fetches a single organization project by ID + * @throws {ApiError} 404 - Project not found + * @throws {ApiError} 403 - Unauthorized access + */ export function getOrganizationProjectAPI(id: string, tenantId?: string) {
29-34: Consider using a type-safe query builderThe query object construction could benefit from type safety and consistent formatting.
Consider this approach:
-const obj = { - 'where[organizationId]': organizationId, - 'where[tenantId]': tenantId, -} -const query = qs.stringify(obj); +interface ProjectsQuery { + where: { + organizationId: string; + tenantId?: string; + }; +} + +const query = qs.stringify({ + where: { + organizationId, + ...(tenantId && { tenantId }) + } +} as ProjectsQuery);apps/web/app/api/organization-projects/route.ts (1)
31-35: Consider implementing pagination for large datasetsThe current implementation fetches all projects at once, which could cause performance issues with large datasets.
Consider:
- Adding pagination parameters to the request
- Implementing cursor-based pagination for better performance
- Adding rate limiting to prevent abuse
Would you like me to provide an example implementation with pagination?
apps/web/app/api/organization-projects/[id]/route.ts (2)
43-43: Remove debug console.log statementDebug logging should not be present in production code.
- console.log(response);
27-46: Consider adding type safety for response dataThe implementation would benefit from proper TypeScript interfaces for the response data structure.
interface OrganizationProject { id: string; // Add other project properties } interface ApiResponse { data: OrganizationProject; } export async function GET( req: Request, { params }: { params: { id: string } } ): Promise<NextResponse<ApiResponse | { error: string }>> { // ... rest of the implementation }apps/web/app/services/server/requests/organization-projects.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-43: Improve type safety by removinganytypes.The existing functions use
anytype extensively, which bypasses TypeScript's type checking and can lead to runtime errors. Consider defining proper interfaces for the request data.Example refactor for the edit functions:
interface ProjectSettingsData { // Define your settings properties here } interface ProjectEditData { // Define your edit properties here } export function editOrganizationProjectsSettingsRequest({ id, datas, bearer_token, tenantId }: { id: string; datas: ProjectSettingsData; bearer_token: string; tenantId: string; }) { return serverFetch<ProjectSettingsData>({ // ... rest remains same }); }
62-84: Enhance query parameter handling and consistency.A few suggestions for improvement:
- Fix the spacing in the type definition.
- Add support for pagination parameters.
- Add validation for query parameters.
Consider this improvement:
export function getOrganizationProjectsRequest({ tenantId, organizationId, - bearer_token + bearer_token, + page = 1, + limit = 10 }: { tenantId: string; bearer_token: string; - organizationId : string; + organizationId: string; + page?: number; + limit?: number; }) { const obj = { 'where[organizationId]': organizationId, 'where[tenantId]': tenantId, + page, + limit } + + // Validate pagination parameters + if (page < 1 || limit < 1) { + throw new Error('Invalid pagination parameters'); + } + const query = qs.stringify(obj);
Line range hint
1-84: Consider implementing request error handling middleware.To improve error handling and maintain consistency across all organization project requests, consider implementing middleware that:
- Standardizes error responses
- Handles network failures
- Validates request parameters
- Logs errors appropriately
This would reduce code duplication and ensure consistent error handling across all requests.
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationProjects.ts (2)
17-27: Consider adding error states for better error handlingWhile the loading states are well-managed, consider adding error states to provide better feedback to users when API calls fail.
const { loading: getOrganizationProjectLoading, queryCall: getOrganizationProjectQueryCall } = - useQuery(getOrganizationProjectAPI); + useQuery(getOrganizationProjectAPI, { + onError: (error) => { + // Handle error appropriately + } + });
53-69: Implement comprehensive error handling strategyThe current error handling only logs to console, which is insufficient for production. Consider implementing a comprehensive error handling strategy:
- Error reporting/logging service integration
- User-friendly error messages
- Error recovery mechanisms
Example implementation:
import { captureException } from '@sentry/react'; // or your preferred error tracking service const handleError = (error: unknown, context: string) => { const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'An unexpected error occurred'; captureException(error, { extra: { context } }); throw new Error(`${context}: ${errorMessage}`); }; // Usage in your functions: try { const res = await getOrganizationProjectsQueryCall(); setOrganizationProjects(res.data.items); } catch (error) { handleError(error, 'Failed to fetch organization projects'); }apps/web/lib/features/task/task-card.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-824: Consider splitting this file into smaller, focused components.The file is becoming quite large (>800 lines) and the TaskCard component handles multiple responsibilities. Consider the following refactoring suggestions:
- Move helper components to separate files:
TaskInfoUsersTaskAssignedTimerButtonCallTaskCardMenuPlanTaskAddTaskToPlanComponentRemoveTaskFromPlanRemoveManyTaskFromPlan
- Extract complex state management into custom hooks:
- Timer-related logic
- Task planning logic
- Menu-related state
This will improve maintainability, make the code more testable, and follow the Single Responsibility Principle.
Example structure:
features/task/ components/ TaskCard.tsx TaskInfo.tsx TaskTimer.tsx TaskMenu.tsx planning/ PlanTask.tsx AddToPlan.tsx RemoveFromPlan.tsx hooks/ useTaskTimer.tsx useTaskPlanning.tsx useTaskMenu.tsxapps/web/locales/en.json (1)
346-346: Minor grammatical improvement needed in the error message.The error message has a slight grammatical issue. Consider rewording for better clarity.
- "TASK_HAS_PARENT": "Task Type can not be changed as Task has already Parent.", + "TASK_HAS_PARENT": "Task Type cannot be changed as Task already has a Parent.",apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsx (2)
308-308: Use strict equality operator===It's recommended to use the strict equality operator
===instead of==to prevent unexpected type coercion. This ensures that the comparison checks both the value and the type.Apply this diff to fix the equality check:
- return project.id == task.projectId + return project.id === task.projectId
355-355: Localize hardcoded strings for internationalizationThe default text
'Project'is hardcoded and not localized. Use the translation function to ensure it's translated appropriately.Apply this diff to localize the default text:
- <p className=" truncate ">{selected?.name ?? 'Project'}</p> + <p className=" truncate ">{selected?.name ?? t('pages.taskDetails.PROJECT')}</p>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
apps/web/app/api/organization-projects/[id]/route.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/app/api/organization-projects/route.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationProjects.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/app/interfaces/IDailyPlan.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/app/services/client/api/organization-projects.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/app/services/server/requests/organization-projects.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/app/stores/organization-projects.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/components/pages/kanban/menu-kanban-card.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsx(4 hunks)apps/web/lib/features/daily-plan/create-daily-plan-form-modal.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/lib/features/task/task-card.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/ar.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/bg.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/de.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/en.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/es.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/fr.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/he.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/it.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/nl.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/pl.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/pt.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/ru.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/zh.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- apps/web/app/interfaces/IDailyPlan.ts
- apps/web/app/stores/organization-projects.ts
- apps/web/components/pages/kanban/menu-kanban-card.tsx
- apps/web/locales/it.json
🔇 Additional comments (26)
apps/web/app/services/client/api/organization-projects.ts (2)
1-4: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized and necessary
All imports are properly utilized in the implementation, following a clean organization pattern.
19-21: Verify API endpoint alignment with routes
Let's ensure the client endpoints align with the server routes mentioned in the summary.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the API endpoints match the corresponding route handlers
# Search for corresponding API routes
echo "Searching for API routes..."
rg -t ts "app/api/organization-projects/\[id\]/route" --files-with-matches
rg -t ts "app/api/organization-projects/route" --files-with-matches
# Search for any other usages of these endpoints
echo "Searching for endpoint usages..."
rg -t ts "'/organization-projects/\$\{id\}'" -A 2
rg -t ts "'/organization-projects\?" -A 2Also applies to: 35-37
apps/web/app/api/organization-projects/route.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import changes are well-structured
The addition of getOrganizationProjectsRequest follows the existing pattern and is properly utilized.
23-38: Verify integration with task details page
The endpoint provides the necessary project listing functionality for the task details page.
Let's verify the integration:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the task details component is properly consuming this endpoint
rg -l "getOrganizationProjectsAPI" "apps/web/app/components"
# Verify error handling in the UI components
rg "useOrganizationProjects.*error" "apps/web/app/components"apps/web/app/api/organization-projects/[id]/route.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement is correctly updated
The import statement properly includes the new getOrganizationProjectRequest function needed for the GET endpoint.
27-46: Verify error handling consistency across the application
Let's verify that the error handling approach is consistent with other API routes in the application.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling patterns in other API routes
echo "Searching for error handling patterns in API routes..."
rg -A 5 "NextResponse\.json.*error.*status" "apps/web/app/api"
# Search for authentication guard usage patterns
echo "Searching for authentication guard usage patterns..."
rg -A 5 "authenticatedGuard" "apps/web/app/api"apps/web/app/services/server/requests/organization-projects.ts (1)
45-60: LGTM! Well-structured and type-safe implementation.
The function is properly typed and follows the established pattern for request functions.
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationProjects.ts (2)
1-15: LGTM! Clean imports and state management setup
The imports are well-organized and the state management using Jotai is appropriate for managing organization projects data.
72-82: Verify integration with task details page
The hook provides all necessary functionality for project management, but let's verify its integration with the task details page as per PR objectives.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of useOrganizationProjects in task details components
echo "Searching for task details components using useOrganizationProjects..."
rg -l "useOrganizationProjects.*task.*detail" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for project editing functionality in task components
echo "Searching for project editing implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const { editOrganizationProject } = useOrganizationProjects()'apps/web/lib/features/daily-plan/create-daily-plan-form-modal.tsx (2)
94-94: LGTM! Fixed typo in planMode comparison.
The correction from 'tomorow' to 'tomorrow' in the planMode comparison is accurate.
Line range hint 1-300: Verify alignment with PR objectives.
This file appears to be unrelated to the PR's main objective of adding project editing capabilities to the task details page. Please clarify if this change was intentionally included in this PR or if it should be moved to a separate bug fix PR.
Let's verify if this file is referenced in any project-related changes:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to this file in other changed files
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 | xargs rg "create-daily-plan-form-modal"
# Search for any project-related changes in this file
rg -i "project" apps/web/lib/features/daily-plan/create-daily-plan-form-modal.tsxapps/web/locales/zh.json (1)
346-347: LGTM! The changes look good.
The changes maintain consistency and correctness:
- The punctuation change in the error message is appropriate
- The new "PROJECT" translation is accurate and follows the established conventions
apps/web/lib/features/task/task-card.tsx (1)
Line range hint 815-823: LGTM! The tomorrow planning implementation is well-structured.
The code follows the established patterns with proper loading state handling and translation support.
apps/web/locales/he.json (1)
346-347: LGTM! The new translations are properly implemented.
The new translations for task parent validation message and project label are correctly added to the taskDetails section with proper Hebrew translations.
apps/web/locales/ar.json (2)
346-346: LGTM: Formatting update looks good.
The updated translation for TASK_HAS_PARENT is properly formatted and grammatically correct in Arabic.
347-347: LGTM: New translation addition.
The Arabic translation "مشروع" for "Project" is correct and appropriately placed under the taskDetails section, aligning with the PR objectives of adding project information to task details.
apps/web/locales/en.json (1)
347-347: LGTM! Project label addition aligns with PR objectives.
The new translation key for "Project" follows the correct naming convention and supports the feature to display project information in task details.
apps/web/locales/nl.json (1)
346-347: LGTM! Changes align with PR objectives.
The reordering of TASK_HAS_PARENT and addition of PROJECT translation are correct. The Dutch translation for "Project" is accurate, and these changes support the enhancement of project information display in the task details page.
apps/web/locales/bg.json (1)
346-347: LGTM! The translations are properly structured.
The new translations for task parent relationship and project label are well-formatted and align with the PR objectives of adding project information to task details.
apps/web/locales/pl.json (1)
346-347: LGTM! Translations are accurate and properly structured.
The Polish translations are correct:
- "Projekt" is the correct translation for "Project"
- The placement in the
taskDetailssection aligns with the PR's objective of adding project information to the task details page
apps/web/locales/ru.json (1)
346-347: LGTM! Verify translations across all localization files.
The Russian translation for "Project" is correct, and the JSON structure is maintained.
Let's verify that the "PROJECT" key is consistently added across all localization files:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent PROJECT translations across all locale files
# Expected: Each locale file should have the PROJECT key under taskDetails
# Find all locale files and check for PROJECT key
fd -e json -d 1 . apps/web/locales --exec sh -c '
echo "Checking {}"
if ! jq -e ".taskDetails.PROJECT" {} > /dev/null; then
echo "❌ Missing PROJECT key in {}"
exit 1
fi
'apps/web/locales/pt.json (1)
346-347: LGTM! Translation keys added correctly.
The new translation keys are properly structured and align with the PR objectives for adding project-related functionality:
- Error message for tasks with parents
- "PROJECT" translation for the task details page
apps/web/locales/es.json (1)
346-347: LGTM! The translations are accurate.
The Spanish translations for both keys are correct:
- "TASK_HAS_PARENT": The message about task type restrictions due to parent tasks is preserved
- "PROJECT": The translation "Proyecto" is the correct Spanish word for "Project"
These changes align well with the PR objective of adding project information to the task details page.
apps/web/locales/de.json (1)
346-347: LGTM! Translations are accurate and well-placed.
The German translations for both keys are correct:
- "TASK_HAS_PARENT" message clearly explains the constraint
- "PROJECT" is accurately translated to "Projekt"
apps/web/locales/fr.json (1)
346-347: LGTM! The French translations are accurate.
The new translations for task parent relationship and project term are grammatically correct and consistent with French language conventions.
Let's verify the consistency of these translations across other language files:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new translations exist in other language files
# Expected: All language files should have these keys with appropriate translations
# Find all locale files
fd -e json -d 1 . apps/web/locales/ --exec sh -c '
echo "=== Checking $1 ==="
# Check for TASK_HAS_PARENT key
jq -r ".taskDetails.TASK_HAS_PARENT // empty" "$1"
# Check for PROJECT key
jq -r ".taskDetails.PROJECT // empty" "$1"
' shapps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsx (1)
293-293: Verify memoization of getOrganizationProjects to prevent unnecessary fetches
Ensure that getOrganizationProjects is memoized to avoid repeated fetching on every render, which can degrade performance.
Run the following script to check if getOrganizationProjects is properly memoized:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if `getOrganizationProjects` is memoized in `useOrganizationProjects`
# Search for the declaration of `getOrganizationProjects` and verify usage of `useCallback`
fd 'useOrganizationProjects.ts' | xargs grep -A 10 'function useOrganizationProjects'
# Expected Result: `getOrganizationProjects` should be wrapped with `useCallback` or similar memoization
apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
CREDO23
force-pushed
the
3099-feature-task--add-project-information-in-task-detail-and-edit-task-properties
branch
from
faa5214
to
6fa9d66
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
apps/web/app/services/server/requests/organization-projects.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-43: Consider improving type safety in existing functionsThe existing functions use
anytype extensively, which defeats TypeScript's type checking benefits. Consider defining proper interfaces for the request data and response types.Example improvement:
interface ProjectSettingsData { // define your settings properties here } interface ProjectUpdateData { // define your update properties here } export function editOrganizationProjectsSettingsRequest({ id, datas, bearer_token, tenantId }: { id: string; datas: ProjectSettingsData; bearer_token: string; tenantId: string; }) { return serverFetch<ProjectSettingsData>({ // ... rest of the implementation }); }
62-84: Clean up formatting and enhance type safetyThe function implementation is good, but could benefit from some improvements:
- Remove unnecessary empty lines (71, 77)
- Add type safety for query parameters
- Consider adding JSDoc to document the query parameters
Here's a suggested improvement:
interface ProjectQueryParams { 'where[organizationId]': string; 'where[tenantId]': string; } /** * Retrieves organization projects with pagination * @param tenantId - The tenant identifier * @param organizationId - Filter projects by organization * @param bearer_token - Authentication token * @returns Paginated list of projects */ export function getOrganizationProjectsRequest({ tenantId, organizationId, bearer_token }: { tenantId: string; bearer_token: string; organizationId: string; }) { const queryParams: ProjectQueryParams = { 'where[organizationId]': organizationId, 'where[tenantId]': tenantId, }; const query = qs.stringify(queryParams); return serverFetch<PaginationResponse<IProject>>({ path: `/organization-projects?${query}`, method: 'GET', bearer_token, tenantId }); }apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationProjects.ts (1)
29-49: Consider reducing code duplication in edit operationsBoth edit operations share very similar structure and error handling. Consider creating a shared utility function to reduce duplication.
+ const executeEditOperation = useCallback( + (operation: Function, id: string, data: any) => { + if (user?.tenantId) { + return operation(id, data, user.tenantId).then((res) => res); + } + }, + [user] + ); const editOrganizationProjectSetting = useCallback( (id: string, data: any) => { - if (user?.tenantId) { - return editOrganizationProjectSettingQueryCall(id, data, user?.tenantId || '').then((res) => { - return res; - }); - } + return executeEditOperation(editOrganizationProjectSettingQueryCall, id, data); }, - [user, editOrganizationProjectSettingQueryCall] + [executeEditOperation, editOrganizationProjectSettingQueryCall] );apps/web/app/interfaces/ITask.ts (1)
Line range hint
164-165: Consider addressing the TODO comment about project type.The comment indicates that the
projectproperty inITaskStatusStackshould be an object type rather than a string. With the new project editing feature, it might be a good time to address this technical debt to ensure proper type safety.Would you like help defining the proper project object type structure? This would improve type safety for the project editing feature.
apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsx (1)
280-287: Enhance JSDoc documentationThe current documentation could be more descriptive. Consider adding:
- Purpose of the component
- Description of what happens when a project is selected/removed
- Return value description including the dropdown structure
/** - * TaskProject dropdown + * A dropdown component that allows users to view, select, or remove a project association for a task. * * @param {Object} props - The props object - * @param {ITeamTask} props.task - The ITeamTask object which + * @param {ITeamTask} props.task - The task object containing current project association * - * @returns {JSX.Element} - The Dropdown element + * @returns {JSX.Element} A dropdown menu displaying available projects with options to select or remove */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
apps/web/app/api/organization-projects/[id]/route.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/app/api/organization-projects/route.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationProjects.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/app/interfaces/IDailyPlan.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/app/interfaces/ITask.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/app/services/client/api/organization-projects.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/app/services/server/requests/organization-projects.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/app/stores/organization-projects.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/components/pages/kanban/menu-kanban-card.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsx(4 hunks)apps/web/lib/features/daily-plan/create-daily-plan-form-modal.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/lib/features/task/task-card.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/ar.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/bg.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/de.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/en.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/es.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/fr.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/he.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/it.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/nl.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/pl.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/pt.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/ru.json(1 hunks)apps/web/locales/zh.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/web/app/interfaces/IDailyPlan.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (19)
- apps/web/app/api/organization-projects/route.ts
- apps/web/app/services/client/api/organization-projects.ts
- apps/web/app/stores/organization-projects.ts
- apps/web/components/pages/kanban/menu-kanban-card.tsx
- apps/web/lib/features/daily-plan/create-daily-plan-form-modal.tsx
- apps/web/lib/features/task/task-card.tsx
- apps/web/locales/ar.json
- apps/web/locales/bg.json
- apps/web/locales/de.json
- apps/web/locales/en.json
- apps/web/locales/es.json
- apps/web/locales/fr.json
- apps/web/locales/he.json
- apps/web/locales/it.json
- apps/web/locales/nl.json
- apps/web/locales/pl.json
- apps/web/locales/pt.json
- apps/web/locales/ru.json
- apps/web/locales/zh.json
🔇 Additional comments (13)
apps/web/app/api/organization-projects/[id]/route.ts (4)
3-3: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate
The addition of getOrganizationProjectRequest import aligns with the new GET functionality.
29-31: Add proper error response for missing ID
The current implementation returns undefined when id is missing, which could lead to unclear error responses.
37-43: Add error handling for external request
The external API call should be wrapped in a try-catch block to handle potential failures gracefully.
27-44: Overall implementation looks good, with noted concerns
The GET method implementation follows good practices:
- Proper authentication check
- Consistent response handling
- Aligns with the PR objective to support project information viewing
However, please address the error handling concerns mentioned above for better reliability.
Let's verify the API endpoint usage:
✅ Verification successful
The previous command failed because ripgrep didn't recognize the typescript file type. Let's try a more basic search pattern to find and analyze the API routes and their error handling patterns.
Based on the extensive search results, I can now verify the error handling patterns across the API routes. Let me analyze the GET endpoint in question and compare it with other implementations.
Error handling implementation is consistent with codebase patterns
The GET endpoint's error handling follows the established patterns seen across the codebase:
- Early return for missing ID parameter
- Authentication check with proper 401 response
- Using the standard
$reswrapper for responses
The implementation aligns with other API routes in the codebase that follow similar patterns, such as:
- Consistent 401 unauthorized responses using
NextResponse.json({ error: 'Unauthorized' }, { status: 401 }) - Parameter validation with early returns
- Proper error propagation from the underlying request functions
No additional error handling is required as the current implementation matches the project's established patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for proper error handling in other API routes
# This helps establish consistency in error handling patterns
# Search for similar API routes and their error handling patterns
rg -t typescript "export async function (GET|PUT|POST|DELETE).+\{.+\}.+\{.+id.+\}" ./apps/web/app/api
Length of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler pattern to find API route handlers
rg -l "export async function (GET|POST|PUT|DELETE)" ./apps/web/app/api
# Then examine their error handling patterns
rg -A 10 "export async function (GET|POST|PUT|DELETE)" ./apps/web/app/api
Length of output: 115618
apps/web/app/services/server/requests/organization-projects.ts (2)
45-60: LGTM! Well-structured function with proper typing
The implementation is clean, properly typed, and follows RESTful conventions. It aligns well with the PR objective of retrieving project information for the task details page.
54-59: Verify API endpoint compatibility
The implemented endpoints align with the PR objectives, but let's verify they're properly configured on the backend.
Also applies to: 78-83
✅ Verification successful
API endpoints are properly implemented and consistent
The verification shows that:
- The endpoints
/organization-projects/${id}and/organization-projects?${query}are consistently implemented in both server and client layers - The IProject interface is properly defined with all necessary fields
- The endpoints follow the same pattern across the codebase for both GET and PUT operations
- The implementation properly handles tenant isolation through tenantId parameter
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the API endpoints are defined in the backend routes
echo "Checking API endpoint definitions..."
rg -l "organization-projects/\$\{id\}" --type ts
rg -l "organization-projects\?" --type ts
# Look for any existing usage patterns
echo "Checking existing usage patterns..."
rg "serverFetch.*organization-projects" --type ts
Length of output: 430
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation and usage of these endpoints
echo "Checking organization-projects implementation..."
rg -A 5 "organization-projects" apps/web/app/services/server/requests/organization-projects.ts
rg -A 5 "organization-projects" apps/web/app/services/client/api/organization-projects.ts
# Check for API route definitions in backend
echo "Checking backend API routes..."
fd "routes|api" --type f | rg -i "api|routes" | xargs rg -l "organization-projects"
# Check for any related models or interfaces
echo "Checking related models..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface IProject {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2311
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationProjects.ts (4)
1-15: LGTM! Clean imports and state management setup
The imports are well-organized, and the state management setup using jotai follows React best practices.
17-27: LGTM! Well-structured query hooks setup
The query hooks are consistently structured with proper loading states and clear naming conventions.
72-82: LGTM! Well-structured hook return value
The hook exposes all necessary operations, loading states, and data with clear, consistent naming.
1-82: Verify hook integration with TaskSecondaryInfo component
Based on the PR objectives, this hook should be integrated with the TaskSecondaryInfo component to enable project editing in the task details page.
✅ Verification successful
Hook is properly integrated with TaskSecondaryInfo component
The hook is correctly integrated and used in the TaskSecondaryInfo component:
- Imported and used in the ProjectDropDown component
- Fetches projects on component mount using
getOrganizationProjects - Projects are displayed in a dropdown for task assignment
- Proper error handling is implemented for project updates
- State management is handled through Jotai atoms
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the hook's integration with TaskSecondaryInfo component
# Check if the hook is imported and used in TaskSecondaryInfo
rg -l "useOrganizationProjects.*TaskSecondaryInfo"
# Check for proper error handling in the component
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
$$$
useOrganizationProjects()
$$$
} catch'
Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the integration
# First, find the TaskSecondaryInfo component
fd TaskSecondaryInfo
# Search for useOrganizationProjects usage in any file
rg "useOrganizationProjects"
# Find imports of useOrganizationProjects
rg "import.*useOrganizationProjects"
Length of output: 1062
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the TaskSecondaryInfo component's implementation to verify proper integration
# Check the implementation of TaskSecondaryInfo
cat apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsx
# Also check if there are any error boundaries or error handling
rg -A 5 "catch" apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsx
Length of output: 12431
apps/web/app/interfaces/ITask.ts (1)
21-21: LGTM! The type change aligns with requirements.
Making projectId nullable supports the feature requirement of allowing users to remove project associations from tasks.
Let's verify that the codebase handles null project IDs appropriately:
✅ Verification successful
The nullable projectId change is safe and properly handled
The codebase analysis shows that making projectId nullable in ITask.ts is consistent with the existing implementation:
- The change aligns with the task creation/update logic in
apps/web/app/services/client/api/tasks.tswhich already handles null projectId - The task secondary info component in
apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsxproperly handles project removal withprojectId: null - Related interfaces like
ITaskIssuealready useprojectId: string | nullpattern - The API routes in
apps/web/app/api/tasks/are designed to work with optional project associations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for projectId usage to ensure proper null handling
rg -t typescript -t tsx "projectId" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for projectId usage with ripgrep, using correct file extensions
rg "projectId" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 44643
apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsx (2)
221-226: LGTM! Clean integration of project section
The project section is well-integrated, following the same pattern and styling as other task properties.
313-319: [Duplicate] Provide user feedback on update errors
This issue was previously identified in an earlier review. The error handling still only logs to console without user feedback.
Also applies to: 325-331
| const getOrganizationProject = useCallback( | ||
| async (id: string) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| return await getOrganizationProjectQueryCall(id); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.log(error); | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| [getOrganizationProjectQueryCall] | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const getOrganizationProjects = useCallback(async () => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const res = await getOrganizationProjectsQueryCall(); | ||
|
|
||
| setOrganizationProjects(res.data.items); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.log(error); | ||
| } | ||
| }, [getOrganizationProjectsQueryCall, setOrganizationProjects]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Standardize the return strategy for get operations
The get operations have inconsistent return strategies:
getOrganizationProjectreturns the API response directlygetOrganizationProjectsupdates state but doesn't return anything
Consider standardizing this behavior based on the consumer's needs.
const getOrganizationProjects = useCallback(async () => {
try {
const res = await getOrganizationProjectsQueryCall();
setOrganizationProjects(res.data.items);
+ return res.data.items; // Return the items for consistency
} catch (error) {
console.log(error);
+ throw error; // Propagate error for consistent error handling
}
}, [getOrganizationProjectsQueryCall, setOrganizationProjects]);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-secondary-info.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…ondary-info.tsx Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
evereq
deleted the
3099-feature-task--add-project-information-in-task-detail-and-edit-task-properties
branch
Description
Fix #3099
Type of Change
Checklist
Current screenshots
Loom
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Localization Updates
Enhancements