Add Stable Diffusion Patch + Notebook Example #7
Conversation
It has a roughly ~25% speedup in my experiments. This is less than I would have thought. What am I missing?
Initial pass at ToMe-ing Stable Diffusion unets
|
Hi @lalalune! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks! |
1 similar comment
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks! |
ghost
mentioned this pull request
|
Hi, I was wondering if there were any updates? |
This adds a preliminary PR for patching vanilla Stable Diffusion.
At 512x512, this increases speed of inference by about 20%. This seems to scale with larger images and corresponding values for r, and also impacts overall memory overhead similarly.
UPDATE: I've signed the CLA and the code seems fine, marking not as draft