-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
General rules clean up #392
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Mike Coleman <[email protected]>
Welcome @mikegcoleman! It looks like this is your first PR to falcosecurity/plugins 🎉 |
Hey @mikegcoleman It looks like there're some yaml validation issues. Could you take a look at the failing tests and fix them, please? For example https://github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/actions/runs/7414200888/job/20294145856?pr=392 |
Signed-off-by: Mike Coleman <[email protected]>
@leogr fixed the formatting issues. took a note to run the yaml validator before submitting a PR next time :) |
Rules files suggestionsgcp_auditlog_rules.yamlComparing Major changes:
Minor changes:
|
Note for releasers: we can just bump the minor since the major is still |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @mikegcoleman
@leogr fixed the formatting issues. took a note to run the yaml validator before submitting a PR next time :)
All good now!
Thank you for this PR 👏
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: leogr, mikegcoleman The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: c1ddb2d29737afa468576f67647a128c16193e90
|
What type of PR is this?
/area plugins
There were some grammatical errors in the rules themselves. Also some rules output messages were wrong (e.g. it would say "an object was created" when the rule was for deletion). I also separated some rules into two rules - in particular I tried to create "delete" and "modify" rules separately since I think admins would prefer to have more specificity in their output.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #391
Special notes for your reviewer: