Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A 2.0.0 release, please? #113

Open
wants to merge 132 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

loegering
Copy link

@loegering loegering commented Sep 7, 2016

I've really enjoyed how this library handles JSONArrays and JSONObjects but sorely miss generics and other nice to have features.

I've forked your library to address all of the issues submitted to your repository. It features generics and a clean API at the cost of losing support for java 2 to 6. Its APIs are otherwise 100% backwards compatible in projects using java 7+ so version 2.3.1 can be dropped in to replace 1.1.1 without any damage to the project. The only real work you'd have to do is update the POM to match the old maven coordinates and it would be ready for a 2.0 release to the maven repositories.

See https://cliftonlabs.github.io/json-simple/ for more details about this fork. I would also be willing to do the maintenance necessary to publish these changes for/with you. If you accept these changes, I think those following this project would appreciate them. Thanks so far for a great JSON library!

Davin Loegering added 30 commits August 31, 2016 17:52
… 8. Serialize honors its flags in sub calls in all circumstances.
…a get for each JSON value. JsonObject tests updated.
Barry Lagerweij and others added 30 commits January 18, 2020 11:21
Support for JsonKey parameter for put and putChain operations
…w explicitly states the current default: %pack. The yychar/position variable is now a long instead of an int. This required changing JsonException to use a long too.
…n class to ensure compatibility with projects that do more advanced JsonException handling.
…r writer instead of the convenience methods that generate their own.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants