Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update maven.yml #6

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Update maven.yml #6

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

bageshwar
Copy link
Collaborator

@bageshwar bageshwar commented Jan 15, 2025

fix pom file

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to build from a specific project subdirectory.

fix pom file
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow for a Java Maven project has been modified to include a working-directory directive set to pibify-core. This change indicates that the Maven build process will execute within the pibify-core directory, rather than the default root directory of the repository. The overall structure of the workflow, including triggers and environment setup, remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/maven.yml Added working-directory: pibify-core to the Maven build command to execute within that directory.

Poem

🐰 In pibify-core, our build takes flight,
With Maven's magic, all feels just right.
A pom.xml tucked away with care,
Our workflow hops with a joyful flare!
A rabbit's craft, both swift and bright! 🏗️


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff40f36 and 9257ccd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/maven.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/maven.yml

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/maven.yml (1)

31-31: Consider documenting project structure changes

The switch to building from pibify-core/pom.xml suggests a potential shift to a multi-module project structure. Consider:

  1. Updating the project's README to reflect the new structure
  2. Documenting the relationship between modules if this is part of a multi-module setup
  3. Ensuring CI/CD workflows for any other modules are properly configured
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ac01ef5 and ff40f36.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/maven.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/maven.yml (2)

31-31: Verify the existence of pibify-core/pom.xml

The build command now references pibify-core/pom.xml instead of the root pom.xml. Let's verify this path exists and contains the correct configuration.

✅ Verification successful

Build configuration correctly points to existing pom.xml

The change to use pibify-core/pom.xml is correct as the file exists with proper Maven project structure.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and basic structure of the pom.xml files

# Check if pibify-core/pom.xml exists
if [ -f "pibify-core/pom.xml" ]; then
    echo "✓ pibify-core/pom.xml exists"
    
    # Check for basic Maven project structure
    grep -A 5 "<project" pibify-core/pom.xml
else
    echo "✗ pibify-core/pom.xml not found"
fi

# Check if there's a parent pom.xml
if [ -f "pom.xml" ]; then
    echo "Note: Root pom.xml also exists"
    grep -A 5 "<project" pom.xml
fi

Length of output: 528


Line range hint 31-36: Verify compatibility with dependency submission action

The workflow includes the Maven dependency submission action. Ensure it can still locate and process dependencies when building from a subdirectory.

@bageshwar bageshwar closed this Jan 15, 2025
@bageshwar bageshwar deleted the fix-build branch January 15, 2025 12:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant