Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flyte-core Expose propeller webhook port 9443 in charts #4804

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2024

Conversation

ddl-ebrown
Copy link
Contributor

@ddl-ebrown ddl-ebrown commented Jan 31, 2024

  • The webhook service exposes 443 and targets port 9443, but the container doesn't expose port 9443

Tracking issue

https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/issues/

Why are the changes needed?

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

How was this patch tested?

Setup process

Screenshots

Check all the applicable boxes

  • I updated the documentation accordingly.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • All commits are signed-off.

Related PRs

Docs link

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. enhancement New feature or request labels Jan 31, 2024
 - The webhook service exposes 443 and targets port 9443, but the
   container doesn't expose port 9443

Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <[email protected]>
@ddl-ebrown ddl-ebrown force-pushed the fix-chart-webhook-port branch from 7254ee5 to e2c7e94 Compare January 31, 2024 23:00
@ddl-ebrown ddl-ebrown changed the title Expose propeller webhook port 9443 in charts Flyte-core Expose propeller webhook port 9443 in charts Feb 1, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2794894) 58.98% compared to head (e2c7e94) 58.98%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4804   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   58.98%   58.98%           
=======================================
  Files         644      644           
  Lines       55145    55145           
=======================================
+ Hits        32527    32528    +1     
+ Misses      20046    20043    -3     
- Partials     2572     2574    +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 58.98% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@davidmirror-ops davidmirror-ops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right, and I wonder how it has been working (or if we haven't noticed the failures) after all these years?
Thank you!

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Feb 1, 2024
@pingsutw pingsutw merged commit 4223a83 into flyteorg:master Feb 6, 2024
50 of 51 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants