Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flyte-core add missing nodeSelector values #4808

Merged

Conversation

ddl-ebrown
Copy link
Contributor

@ddl-ebrown ddl-ebrown commented Jan 31, 2024

  • The syncresources (cluster resource sync) deployment never exposed a way to configure a standard nodeSelector. Set one up.

  • The propeller webhook should use the defined propeller nodeSelector to configure itself

Tracking issue

https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/issues/

Why are the changes needed?

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

How was this patch tested?

Setup process

Screenshots

Check all the applicable boxes

  • I updated the documentation accordingly.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • All commits are signed-off.

Related PRs

Docs link

 - The syncresources (cluster resource sync) deployment never exposed a
   way to configure a standard nodeSelector. Set one up.

 - The propeller webhook should use the defined propeller nodeSelector
   to configure itself

Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <[email protected]>
@dosubot dosubot bot added size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. enhancement New feature or request labels Jan 31, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2794894) 58.98% compared to head (8d23033) 58.56%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4808      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.98%   58.56%   -0.42%     
==========================================
  Files         644      592      -52     
  Lines       55145    51476    -3669     
==========================================
- Hits        32527    30147    -2380     
+ Misses      20046    18914    -1132     
+ Partials     2572     2415     -157     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 58.56% <ø> (-0.42%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@davidmirror-ops davidmirror-ops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you. I see this change to be useful in multi-cluster deployments, among other scenarios.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Feb 5, 2024
@davidmirror-ops davidmirror-ops merged commit df1b034 into flyteorg:master Feb 5, 2024
50 of 51 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants