Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MODFQMMGR-79 Add filterValueGetter to entityTypeColumn #27

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2023

Conversation

mweaver-ebsco
Copy link
Contributor

This new property will allow us to specify a column accessor that is different from what the user actually sees. The current use case for this is columns with an index on left(lower(f_unaccent(column)), 600). We want to use that form in the WHERE clause of queries, but want the user to see it without the extra processing.

This new property will allow us to specify a column accessor that is
different from what the user actually sees. The current use case for
this is columns with an index on left(lower(f_unaccent(column)), 600).
We want to use that form in the WHERE clause of queries, but want the
user to see it without the extra processing.
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Copy link
Contributor

@kjain110 kjain110 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It took me hours to review this PR :)

@mweaver-ebsco mweaver-ebsco merged commit ada663a into master Dec 4, 2023
5 checks passed
@mweaver-ebsco mweaver-ebsco deleted the MODFQMMGR-79-searchable branch December 4, 2023 18:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants