Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "STCLI-260 bump NodeJS to v20 (#371)" #376

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

zburke
Copy link
Member

@zburke zburke commented Feb 14, 2025

This reverts commit 69b4aef.

The Jenkins nodes where we build platform-complete don't yet have NodeJS v20 and we don't know when it will be available. In the interest of making other changes (which, AFAIK, do directly not rely on NodeJS v20) available ASAP, we are reverting this change until our build nodes can support it.

Refs STCLI-260

This reverts commit 69b4aef.

The Jenkins nodes where we build platform-complete don't yet have NodeJS
v20 and we don't know when it will be available. In the interest of
making other changes (which, AFAIK, do directly not rely on NodeJS v20)
available ASAP, we are reverting this change until our build nodes can
support it.

Refs STCLI-260
@zburke zburke requested a review from a team as a code owner February 14, 2025 12:42
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Jest Unit Test Results

0 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit f1dc9bf. ± Comparison against base commit 3a3e3f5.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

@Dmitriy-Litvinenko Dmitriy-Litvinenko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please close task as won't do or reopen it and move to another sprint/release if needed? For resolve miscommunication in future.

@zburke zburke merged commit 2258a82 into master Feb 14, 2025
25 checks passed
@zburke zburke deleted the STCLI-260-revert branch February 14, 2025 13:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants