-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge eval form into eval criteria #86
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
* Avoid two documents with almost the same content. * Avoid that the two documents get out of sync. * Ensure that the references to the "Values", like `(6)`, are in the evaluation form, and can be found in both raw and rendered form.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor suggestion below, otherwise looks good
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed that this is a significant improvement. I don't have a strong view about the numbering under Values. Numbers make it easier to reference, but I take the point about renumbering. That said, I don't think this lists changes frequently.
Co-authored-by: Kevin Day <[email protected]>
(6)
, are in the evaluation form, and can be found in both raw and rendered form.