FIO-9329: validateWhenHidden respects both conditionally hidden and intentionally hidden #5906
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
7 tasks
johnformio
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2024
lane-formio
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2024
…ntentionally hidden (#5906) * validateWhenHidden respects all kinds of visibility * add clearOnHide: false to fix test
blakekrammes
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2024
…ntentionally hidden (#5906) * validateWhenHidden respects all kinds of visibility * add clearOnHide: false to fix test
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link to Jira Ticket
https://formio.atlassian.net/browse/FIO-9329
Description
Previously, the
validateWhenHiddenparameter would only check for conditional visibility when deciding whether or not to validate. This PR changes that behavior to respect both conditional and intention visibility (e.g. via thehiddenparameter).Breaking Changes / Backwards Compatibility
n/a, because this is technically how the feature was supposed to be implemented
Dependencies
How has this PR been tested?
Automated tests added, manual testing
Checklist: